Abhilasha Sharma vs The State Of Himachal Pradesh on 4 March, 2025

0
110

Leave granted.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the

parties.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the second and

third respondents who are the complainants in a private

complaint filed under Section 200 of the Code of Criminal

Procedure, 1973 (for short, “the CRPC”) alleging

commission of the offences under Section 420, 120-B, 406,

407, 379 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for

short, “the IPC”). The summons was issued by the learned

Magistrate on the said complaint against the appellants

for the offences punishable under Section 379 and 120-B

of the IPC. We may note here that the first appellant is

the wife of the third respondent and the second

respondent is the mother-in-law of the first appellant.

[ad_1]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here