Abhishek Palan vs The State By on 19 June, 2025

0
27

Karnataka High Court

Abhishek Palan vs The State By on 19 June, 2025

Author: S Vishwajith Shetty

Bench: S Vishwajith Shetty

                                             -1-
                                                          NC: 2025:KHC:21187
                                                       CRL.P No. 101 of 2025


                HC-KAR



                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                           DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025

                                          BEFORE
                       THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY
                            CRIMINAL PETITION NO.101 OF 2025
                BETWEEN:

                    ABHISHEK PALAN
                    S/O. UDAYA PALAN
                    AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS
                    RESIDENT OF OPPOSITE ST. POWL CHURCH
                    SUBRAMANYA NAGAR, PUTTUR VILLAGE
                    UDUPI DISTRICT-574 201.

                                                                ...PETITIONER
                    (BY SRI K.V. SATEESH CHANDRA, ADVOCATE)

                AND:

                    THE STATE
                    BY KOTA POLICE STATION
                    KOTA, BRAHMAVARA CIRCLE
                    UDUPI DISTRICT-576 221.
Digitally           REPRESENTED BY
signed by           STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
KAVYA R             KARNATAKA HIGH COURT BUILDING
Location:           BENGALURU-560 001.
High Court of                                                  ...RESPONDENT
Karnataka           (BY SMT. RASHMI PATEL, H.C.G.P.)

                      THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 OF
                THE CR.P.C PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS PETITION AND ENLARGE THE
                PETITIONER ON BAIL IN S.C.NO.11 OF 2019 (CRIME NO.15 OF 2019
                OF KOTA POLICE STATION) ON THE FILE OF THE COURT OF THE
                PRINCIPAL AND ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE,
                UDUPI DISTRICT, UDUPI FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCES PUNISHABLE
                UNDER SECTIONS 143, 147, 148, 449, 323, 307, 302, 120-B, 109,
                342, 504, 324, 506, 201, 212 READ WITH SECTION 149 OF IPC AND
                DIRECT THAT THIS PETITIONER BE RELEASED ON BAIL.
                                  -2-
                                                NC: 2025:KHC:21187
                                           CRL.P No. 101 of 2025


HC-KAR



      THIS CRIMINAL PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS
DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:



CORAM:     HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY

                          ORAL ORDER

Accused No.7 in Sessions Case No.11/2019 pending

before the Court of Principal District and Sessions Judge,

Udupi District, Udupi, arising out of Crime No.15/2019,

registered by Kota Police Station, Udupi, for offences

punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 449, 323, 307,

302, 120B, 109, 342, 504, 324, 506, 201, 212 red with

Section 149 of IPC is before this Court under Section 439

of code of Criminal Procedure, seeking regular bail.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

3. F.I.R. in Crime No.15/2019 was registered by Kota

Police Station for the aforesaid offences against

Rajashekar Reddy and others based on the first

information dated 27.01.2019 received from Lohith Poojari

S/o. Ramachandra, who is the injured victim in the

present case. During the course of investigation,
-3-
NC: 2025:KHC:21187
CRL.P No. 101 of 2025

HC-KAR

petitioner herein was arrested on 09.02.2019 and

subsequently remanded to judicial custody. After

completing investigation charge sheet has been filed

against 18 persons and petitioner is arrayed as accused

No.7 in the charge sheet. His bail application filed before

the jurisdictional Sessions Court in S.C.No.11/2019 was

rejected on 05.09.2019 and therefore, he had approached

this Court in Criminal Petition No.2072/2020, which was

rejected by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court by order

dated 09.07.2020. The petitioner is now before this Court

in this successive bail application on the ground of delay in

filing.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner having reiterated

the grounds urged in the petition submits that prosecution

has already completed its side of evidence and though the

matter was posted for the purpose of recording the

statement of the accused under Section 313 of Cr.P.C. on

10.04.2024, there is no progress in the case thereafter.

Petitioner is in custody for the last more than six years. In
-4-
NC: 2025:KHC:21187
CRL.P No. 101 of 2025

HC-KAR

two other criminal cases registered against him petitioner

has already been acquitted, he accordingly prays to allow

the petition.

5. Per contra, learned HCGP, who has opposed the

petition, does not dispute the submission made by learned

counsel for the petitioner.

6. F.I.R. in the present case was registered in Crime

No.15/2019 by Kota Police Station, Udupi, against

Rajashekar Reddy and others. Undisputedly, petitioner’s

name is not found in the FIR. During the course of

investigation he was arrested on 09.02.2019 and ever

since then he is in custody. His bail application filed

before this Court, earlier in Criminal Petition

No.2072/2020 was rejected on 08.07.2020 wherein it is

observed that if the accused are enlarged on bail, the

chances of they tampering the prosecution witness cannot

be ruled out. Thereafter the prosecution has examined its

witnesses and closed its side before the Trial Court and the
-5-
NC: 2025:KHC:21187
CRL.P No. 101 of 2025

HC-KAR

matter was adjourned on 10.04.2024 for the purpose of

recording the statement of the accused under Section 313

of Cr.P.C. Order sheet of the Trial Court which is made

available to this Court by the learned HCGP today would

go to show that till date the statement of the accused

under Section 313 of Cr.P.C. has not been recorded by the

Trial Court. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of

JAVED GULAM NABI SHAIKH V. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

AND ANOTHER – 2024 SCC ONLINE SC 1693 at paragraph

No.19 has observed as follows:

“19. If the State or any prosecuting agency

including the court concerned has no wherewithal to

provide or protect the fundamental right of an

accused to have a speedy trial as enshrined under

Article 21 of the Constitution then the State or any

other prosecuting agency should not oppose the

plea for bail on the ground that the crime committed

is serious. Article 21 of the Constitution applies

irrespective of the nature of the crime”.
-6-

NC: 2025:KHC:21187
CRL.P No. 101 of 2025

HC-KAR

7. It is not dispute that in the other two criminal cases

which were registered against the petitioner, he has been

already acquitted and the said judgment and order of

acquittal has attained finality. In the present case

petitioner is in custody for the last more than six years.

For the last more than one year there is absolutely no

progress in the case, before the Trial Court. Under the

circumstances, I am of the view that without expressing

any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, prayer

made by the petitioner for grant of regular bail needs to

be answered in the affirmative, considering his period of

incarceration. Accordingly the following :-

ORDER

The petition is allowed. The petitioner is directed to

be enlarged on bail in Crime No.15/2019 of Kota Police

Station registered for the offences punishable under

Sections 143, 147, 148, 449, 323, 307, 302, 120B, 109,

342, 504, 324, 506, 201, 212 r/w 149 of IPC subject to

the following conditions:

-7-

NC: 2025:KHC:21187
CRL.P No. 101 of 2025

HC-KAR

a) Petitioner shall execute personal bond for a sum of

Rs.1,00,000/- (one lakh) with two sureties for the likesum,

to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Court;

b) The petitioner shall appear regularly on all the dates

of hearing before the Trial Court unless the Trial Court

exempts his appearance for valid reasons;

c) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly threaten

or tamper with the prosecution witnesses;

d) The petitioner shall not involve in similar offences in

future;

e) The petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction of the

Trial Court without permission of the said Court until the

case registered against him is disposed off.

Sd/-

(S VISHWAJITH SHETTY)
JUDGE

NG
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 28

[ad_1]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here