Achintha Mondal vs State Of Kerala on 4 July, 2025

0
1

Petitioners in these applications seek regular bail under

section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short

‘the BNSS’). Since the accused in all these applications are alleged to

have committed offences under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic

Substances Act, 1985 (for short ‘the NDPS Act’), and they claim the

right to be released on bail alleging that the grounds for arrest have

not been communicated, the cases are being disposed by this

common order.

2. I have heard Sri. Babu S. Nair, Sri. N.A. Shafeek,

Sri. K.K. Dheerendra Krishnan, Smt. Sai Pooja and Smt. Fathima

Sulfath N.B, the learned counsel for the respective petitioners. It was

contended that the entire allegations against the petitioners are false

and they are all innocent. Apart from contending that there is a total
Bail Appl. Nos.6366, 6621,
6676, 6677, 6989, 6996,
7025, 7162, & 7266/2025

2025:KER:48864
absence of any material to connect the petitioners with the offence,

the learned counsel submitted that the constitutional right of being

informed of the grounds for arrest was not complied with, and

therefore, the accused ought to be released forthwith.



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here