Ajay @ Ajay Watas vs The State Of Bihar on 24 July, 2025

0
1


passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class,

Bhojpur at Ara by which the learned trial Court has issued

summon against the petitioner as well as the entire proceeding of

Complaint Case No. 961(C) of 2022.

3. Notices were issued to opposite party no. 2 on

19.06.2023 by both modes and again fresh notices were issued on

17.10.2024 by both modes but despite valid service of notice to
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10128 of 2023 dt.24-07-2025

opposite party no. 2 by registered cover with A/D and the same

being received personally, he has neither appeared before this

Court personally nor through his counsel.

4. The prosecution case is to the effect that the

complainant previously used to live in Sonepat, Haryana when he

used to work at the ICD State Transport. At that time, the

complainant had two buses which used to ply in the name of

Haryana State Road Lines. Thereafter, the complainant requested

the petitioner for sanction of loan and for the purpose of the same

the complainant submitted his Aadhar Card, PAN Card, Passbook

etc. but the loan was not sanctioned. It is further alleged that the

petitioner asked the complainant for bringing some other person’s

documents for sanctioning the loan, as such, he has brought the

documents of two persons namely Lakhan Lal Singh and

Dharamsheela and their loan has been sanctioned and for the said

purpose they had been demanded Rs. 1,00,000/- each but on

account of non-fulfilment of the same to the complainant the

present complaint has been lodged.



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here