Akhilesh Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 24 July, 2025

0
2


Patna High Court – Orders

Akhilesh Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 24 July, 2025

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                   CRIMINAL REVISION No.622 of 2024
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-301 Year-2023 Thana- PHULWARIYA District- Gopalganj
                 ======================================================
                 Akhilesh Kumar Son of Dhroop Bhagat @ Dhrup Bhagat R/O Khirya, P.s.-
                 Bhorey, Dist.- Gopalganj. Under the Guardianship of His Mother namely
                 Sumitra Devi wife of Dhroop Bhagat @ Dhrup Bhagat.

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s    :       Mr. Pankaj Kumar Dubey
                 For the Respondent/s    :       Mr. Binod Kumar
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIBEK CHAUDHURI
                                       ORAL ORDER
9   24-07-2025

This is an application under Section 102 of the

Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015

filed on behalf of a Juvenile aged about 14 years through is

mother, namely, Sumitra Devi, challenging an order passed in

Criminal Appeal No. 59/2023 by the learned Additional

Sessions Judge 1st Court at Gopalganj against the order dated

08th November 2023 passed by the Juvenile Justice Board,

Gopalganj. By passing the impugned order, the trial court

rejected the prayer for bail of the CiCL and dismissed the appeal

confirming the order passed by the Juvenile Justice Board,

Gopalganj.

2. It is pertinent to note that Phulwariya P.S. Case No.

301/2023 was registered under Sections 302/120B/34 of the IPC

against the CiCL on the death of one Aryan Kumar, a student of

Class Nursery in New Gyan Lok Competition School situated at

Majirawan. As per the statement of the informant, who is the
Patna High Court CR. REV. No.622 of 2024(9) dt.24-07-2025
2/6

grandfather of the deceased, the maternal uncle of the deceased

received a phone call from school that the deceased received

bodily injury in course of a mutual fighting between the students

and he had been sent to Fathua Hospital for medical treatment.

The informant rushed to the hospital and found the dead body of

the victim lying in the hospital in an unattended condition and

there were no teachers or non teaching staffs of the school.

Initially, the FIR was lodged against the Principle and some

other teachers of the said school. On the basis of the said

Fardbeyan, police registered FIR bearing P.S. Case No. 301 of

2023 and took up the case for investigation. During

investigation, it was ascertained that the deceased and the CiCL,

on the date and time of occurrence went to the roof of the

school, thereafter, his dead body was found with lacerated

wound on her head, face and other parts of body as well as

marks of throttling. During investigation, police recovered

blood-stained wearing apparels of the CiCL. The said wearing

apparels were sent to the CFSL and report was obtained. The

police also seized piece of brick with stain of blood and some

hair stuck on it. On the basis of the evidence, the CiCL was

apprehended and charge sheet was submitted against him. The

case is at present, at the stage of trial and except the official
Patna High Court CR. REV. No.622 of 2024(9) dt.24-07-2025
3/6

witnesses all the witnesses were examined.

3. From brief narration of the incident as well as the

evidence collected by the I.O., at the time of investigation which

I have already described, it appears to this Court that the instant

case is based on on substantial evidence. There is no eye-

witness of the occurrence.

4. Section 3 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and

Protection of Children) Act, 2015 lays down general principles

to be followed in administration of the Act. The fundamental

principles are as follows:-

“(i) Principle of presumption of innocence:

(ii) Principle of dignity and worth

(iii) Principle of participation

(iv) Principle of best interest

(v) Principle of family responsibility

(vi) Principle of safety

(vii) Positive measures

(viii) Principle of non-stigmatising semantics:

(ix) Principle of non-waiver of rights

(x) Principle of equality and non-discrimination

(xi) Principle of right to privacy and confidentiality:

(xii) Principle of institutionalisation as a measure of
last resort

(xiii) Principle of repatriation and restoration

(xiv) Principle of fresh start

(xv) Principle of diversion
Patna High Court CR. REV. No.622 of 2024(9) dt.24-07-2025
4/6

(xvi) Principles of natural justice”

5. Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015 states

that in case of a CiCL, who is apprehended or detained by

police or appears or brought before a Board, on the allegation of

committing bailable or non bailable offence, is apprehended or

detained by the police or appears or brought before a Board,

such person shall, notwithstanding anything contained in the

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 or in any other law for the

time being in force, be released on bail with or without surety or

placed under the supervision of a probation officer or under the

care of any fit person.

6. Proviso to Section 12 says that such person shall

not be so released if there appears reasonable grounds for

believing that the release is likely to bring that person into

association with any known criminal or expose the said person

to moral, physical or psychological danger or the person’s

release would defeat the ends of justice, and the Board shall

record the reasons for denying the bail and circumstances that

led to such a decision.

7. On perusal of the impugned order passed by the

appellate court, this Court finds that the bail of the CiCL was

rejected and the criminal appeal was dismissed only on the

ground that the released is likely to bring the person into
Patna High Court CR. REV. No.622 of 2024(9) dt.24-07-2025
5/6

association with any known criminal.

8. Before the commission of alleged offence, the

CiCL used to stay in the hostel of the above-named school. The

I.O. or the Probation Officer failed to collect any evidence to the

effect that the victim was associated with some known criminals

prior to the occurrence. The alleged incident is a solidarity

incident allegedly committed by the CiCL with a fellow student.

9. It is needless to say that the Juvenile Justice (Care

and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 is a socially beneficial

legislation for the purpose of reformation of the children in

conflict with law. The children in need of care and protection.

The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act,

2015 is required to be administered on the basis of the principle

of presumption of innocence. Under Clause (xiii) of Section 3,

every child in the Juvenile Justice System shall have the right to

be re-united with his family and to be restored to some socio-

economic and cultural status that he was in, before coming

under the purview of this Act, unless such restoration and

repatriation is not in his best interest of the CiCL. Further, the

CiCL is in protection home since 20.08.2023.

10. For the reasons stated above, I am inclined to

release the above-named petitioner on bail, on furnishing
Patna High Court CR. REV. No.622 of 2024(9) dt.24-07-2025
6/6

bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty-five thousand) with two

sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of the

learned Additional Sessions Judge 1st Gopalganj, in

connection with Criminal Appeal No. 59 of 2023 arising out

of Phulwariya P.S. Case No. 301 of 2023 with the condition

that one of the bailors must be either of the parents of the

petitioner. It is further directed that, if released on bail, the

petitioner shall remain under the care and protection of his

parents and under the supervision of the Probation Officer.

The Probation Officer is directed to file a quarterly report

before the concerned Court regarding the antecedents. If

any adverse report is filed, the order of bail shall be

cancelled without further reference to the Bench.

11. It is hereby directed that the record of the trial

court be returned to the concerned court below forthwith for

necessary compliance and further proceedings, if any, in

accordance with law.

(Bibek Chaudhuri, J)
Suraj Dubey/-

U      T
 



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here