Patna High Court – Orders
Akhilesh Sharma @ Aklesh Sharma @ … vs The State Of Bihar on 16 June, 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.73158 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-3640 Year-2009 Thana- VAISALI COMPLAINT CASE
District- Vaishali
======================================================
Akhilesh Sharma @ Aklesh Sharma @ Akhilesh Kumar Son of Ramnaumi
Sharma Village- Naya Gaon, Ps- Desri, Dist- Vaishali
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Reena Devi Wife of Akhilesh Sharma Village- Naya Gaon, Ps- Desri, Dist-
Vaishali At Present Residing at D/o- Suresh Sharma, Village- Sabalpur
Chaharan, Ps- Sonpur, Dist- Saran
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Mritunjay Kumar
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Pushpa Sinha.1
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA
ORAL ORDER
8 16-06-2025
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP
for the State. Despite issuance of notice to the opposite party no.
2, she has not appeared in the present proceeding.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case
registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148,
323, 498A, 406, 504 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 &
4 of the D.P. Act.
3. The prosecution case is based upon a complaint filed
by the opposite party no. 2 in which she has made an allegation
of demand of dowry and torture. Petitioner is the husband of
opposite party no.2.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
allegations levelled in the complaint are not correct and as a
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73158 of 2024(8) dt.16-06-2025
2/2
matter of fact, the petitioner has always been ready to keep the
opposite party no.2 with full dignity and honour while the
opposite party no. 2 herself is not ready to reside in the
matrimonial house. A supplementary affidavit has also been
filed bringing on record the fact that no coercive processes
have been issued against the petitioner till date.
5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for
bail.
6. In such view of the matter, let the above named
petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or
surrender before the learned Court below within a period of
four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-
(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount
each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the
case is pending/successor court in connection with Complaint
Case No. 3640/09/Tr. No. 638, subject to the condition as laid
down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C./482(2) of the
B.N.S.S., and subject to the further condition that the petitioner
shall cooperate in the investigation/trial.
(Soni Shrivastava, J)
devendra/-
U T