Alok Yadav vs The State Of Bihar on 6 March, 2025

Patna High Court – Orders

Alok Yadav vs The State Of Bihar on 6 March, 2025

Author: Satyavrat Verma

Bench: Satyavrat Verma

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7914 of 2025
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-14 Year-2024 Thana- Tetiyabumber District- Munger
                 ======================================================
                 Alok Yadav S/o Brahamdeo Yadav R/o Village- Kharui, P.S.- Tetia Bamber,
                 District- Munger

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Ramchandra Sahni
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   06-03-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

learned A.P.P. for the State, Shri Chandra Bhushan Prasad.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case

registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148,

149, 341, 342, 323, 324, 307, 332, 333, 337, 338, 427, 224, 188

and 186 of the IPC.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

petitioner has antecedent of one case and the informant alleges

that on secret information that accused are indulging in selling of

liquor, the informant reached the place of occurrence and

apprehended three accused, who disclosed their names as Alok,

Sheonandan and Tuni, but they raised alarm, on which people

gathered and attacked the force and taking advantage of the

situation, the apprehended accused fled.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7914 of 2025(2) dt.06-03-2025
2/3

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case. It is

next submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the

FIR, it would manifest that liquor was not recovered from

possession of the petitioner. It is also submitted that since

petitioner resides at a place nearby to the place of occurrence, as

such he came to be implicated. It is also submitted that petitioner

will not abscond, rather will cooperate in the investigation to prove

his innocence.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for

anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned

counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the

event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court

within a period of six weeks from today, be released on

Provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.

5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like

amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where

the case is pending/successor court in connection with Tetiya

Bamber P.S. Case No. 14 of 2024, subject to the conditions as

laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

7. It is made clear that thereafter the learned Trial Court

shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7914 of 2025(2) dt.06-03-2025
3/3

event if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of more than one

case, in that event, the provisional anticipatory bail order shall not

be confirmed, but after verification if it is found that petitioner has

antecedent of one case, in that event, the provisional anticipatory

bail order shall be confirmed forthwith.

(Satyavrat Verma, J)
SUMIT/-

U     T