Amandeep Singh vs State Of Punjab on 29 July, 2025

Supreme Court – Daily Orders

Amandeep Singh vs State Of Punjab on 29 July, 2025

     ITEM NO.6                             COURT NO.9                  SECTION II­B

                                  S U P R E M E C O U R T O F     I N D I A
                                          RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

                         Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.)    No.8960/2025

     [Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19­05­2025
     in CRM­M No. 22566/2025 passed by the High Court of Punjab &
     Haryana at Chandigarh]

     AMANDEEP SINGH                                                      Petitioner(s)
                                                   VERSUS

     STATE OF PUNJAB                                                     Respondent(s)


     (IA No. 144426/2025 ­ EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED
     JUDGMENT, IA No. 144425/2025 ­ EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)

     Date : 29­07­2025 This matter was called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :
                            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.B. PARDIWALA
                            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN

     For Petitioner(s) :Mr. Aman Gupta, AOR
                        Mr. Yajur Sharma, Adv.
                        Mr. Anup Kashyap, Adv.

     For Respondent(s) :Ms. Nupur Kumar, AOR
                        Ms. Niharika Tanwar, Adv.

                             UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                                O R D E R

1. The petitioner has been denied anticipatory bail by the High

Court in connection with the First Information Report No. 5/2025

Signature Not Verified

Digitally signed by
CHANDRESH
Date: 2025.07.29
18:29:16 IST
1
Reason:
registered with Police Station Kamboj, District Amritsar Rural for

the offence punishable under Sections 115(2), 333 and 3(5) of the

Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (erstwhile Sections 323, 452, and 34

of the Indian Penal Code, 1860).

2. While issuing notice, we also passed an interim order

protecting the petitioner from being arrested.

3. The entire incident occurred on account of a matrimonial

dispute.

4. Today when the matter was taken up for hearing Ms. Nupur

Kumar, the learned counsel appearing for the State appeared and

pointed out that the petitioner has joined the investigation and

has been cooperating. Besides she also pointed out fairly that the

parties are now trying to resolve the dispute.

5. In such circumstances, we allow this petition and order that

in the event of arrest of the petitioner by the police, he shall be

released on bail, subject to terms and conditions that the

Investigating Officer may deem fit to impose.

6. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of.

(CHANDRESH)                                                (POOJA SHARMA)
ASTT. REGISTRAR­cum­PS                                   COURT MASTER (NSH)


                                                                                  2