Patna High Court – Orders
Amar Kumar Sinha vs The State Of Bihar on 12 June, 2025
Author: Partha Sarthy
Bench: Partha Sarthy
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13414 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-257 Year-2023 Thana- BIHIA District- Bhojpur
======================================================
Amar Kumar Sinha Son of Ravi Ranjan Verma Resident of Village- Kharauni,
P.S.- Bihiya, District- Bhojpur
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bhavesh Kumar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY
ORAL ORDER
3 12-06-2025
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The petitioner has preferred this application for
grant of regular bail in connection with Sessions Trial no.147 of
2024 (arising out of Bihiya P.S. Case no.257 of 2023) registered
under sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and section
27 of the Arms Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, the informant states
that while he was sitting at his agricultural land, the ten named
accused persons including the petitioner came. On the orders of
Shyamakant Verma and Arun Kumar Sinha, the petitioner is said
to have fired from his pistol hitting the brother of the informant
in his neck. Thereafter it is stated that the petitioner caught hold
of the informant while Shyamakant Verma caught hold of
Vishnu Kumar Pandey. Vipin Kumar Sinha fired on Shamsher
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13414 of 2025(3) dt.12-06-2025
2/3
Jung while Saurabh Kumar Sinha attempted to fire on the
informant but on the informant catching hold of his hand, the
fire went in the air. Shamsher Jung died in the occurrence.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. The trial has
commenced in the learned Court below, however, inspite of the
petitioner being in custody since 2.5.2024, the same has still not
concluded. The petitioner be enlarged on bail and he undertakes
to abide by any conditions which may be laid by this Court for
his release on bail.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P.
for the State and learned counsel for the informant. Learned
counsel for the informant submits that there is direct allegation
against the petitioner of having fired with the pistol on the
brother of the informant hitting him in his neck as a result of
which he died.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and
taking into consideration the allegations against the petitioner of
being one of the assailants of the deceased together with the trial
having commenced in the learned trial Court, the Court is not
inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and the application is
rejected.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13414 of 2025(3) dt.12-06-2025
3/3
7. Learned trial Court is directed to expedite the trial.
(Partha Sarthy, J)
Saurabh/-
U T