Amarjit Jha @ Raja Babu @ Amarit Jha vs The State Of Bihar on 10 July, 2025

0
77

[ad_1]

Patna High Court – Orders

Amarjit Jha @ Raja Babu @ Amarit Jha vs The State Of Bihar on 10 July, 2025

Author: Chandra Prakash Singh

Bench: Chandra Prakash Singh

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                  CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.2565 of 2024
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-355 Year-2022 Thana- LADANIA District- Madhubani
                 ======================================================
                 Amarjit Jha @ Raja Babu @ Amarit Jha S/o Lalitesh Kumar Jha @
                 Laliteshwar Jha @ Gannu Jha R/o Village- Padma, P.S.- Ladaniya, District-
                 Madhubani.

                                                                                  ... ... Appellant/s
                                                       Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar.
           2.    Garib Paswan S/o Mahendra Paswan, R/o Village- Patauna, P.S.- Basopatti,
                 District- Madhubani.

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Appellant/s     :        Mr. Yogesh Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Respondent/s    :        Mr. Binay Krishna, Spl. P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH
                 SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

5   10-07-2025

Re: I.A. No. 01 of 2025:

Heard learned counsel for the appellant, learned

counsel for the respondent no. 2 and learned Spl. P.P. for the

State.

2. The present I.A. No. 01 of 2025 has been filed

for treating the service of notices as valid service of notice, as

the notice addressed to respondent no. 2 has been received by

his mother.

3. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that

Resma Devi is the mother of respondent no. 2, i.e., Garib

Paswan and they live jointly in a joint house.

4. For the reasons mentioned in the I.A. No. 01 of
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2565 of 2024(5) dt.10-07-2025
2/4

2025, the same is allowed and service of notice is accepted as

valid service of notice.

5. Accordingly, I.A. No. 01 of 2025 stands disposed

of.

Re: Cr. Appeal No. 2565 of 2024:

6. This is an appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of the

Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of

Atrocities Act), 1989 (hereinafter referred to as “SC/ST Act”)

against the refusal of prayer for anticipatory bail of the appellant

vide order dated 02.05.2024 passed by the learned 1st Additional

Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge Madhubani, in connection

with A.B.P. No. 704 of 2024, arising out of Ladaniya P.S. Case

No. 355 of 2022 dated 02.12.2022 registered for the alleged

offences under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 506, 504 / 34 of the

Indian Penal Code and under Sections 3(i)(r) / 3(2)(v)(a) of the

Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of

Atrocities) Act.

7. As per prosecution case, the informant along

with his friends was going to attend a marriage party and on the

way they stopped for tea at Padma Chowk, where the accused

persons started abusing him by calling his caste name. On being

objected, they started assaulting the informant and his friends
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2565 of 2024(5) dt.10-07-2025
3/4

with fists and slaps. When his friend, Chandra Bhusan Singh

came to rescue, they also assaulted him with bamboo causing

injury on his head and eyes.

8. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that

the appellant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this

case. Learned counsel has further submitted that the caste name

was not disclosed by anyone at the time of the alleged

occurrence. There is general and omnibus allegation against the

appellant. As per FIR, no member of public was present at the

relevant point of time of the incident. Learned counsel has

further submitted that no specific caste name has been called by

the appellant, hence, no case is made out under Section SC/ST

Act. The appellant has clean antecedent as mentioned in

paragraph no. 3 of the bail application.

9. Learned Spl. P.P. for the State as well as learned

counsel for the respondent no. 2 have opposed the prayer for

anticipatory bail of the appellant.

10. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances

of the case as well as the fact that no case is made out against

the appellant, the impugned order dated 02.05.2024 passed by

the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge

Madhubani, in connection with A.B.P. No. 704 of 2024 arising
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2565 of 2024(5) dt.10-07-2025
4/4

out of Ladaniya P.S. Case No. 355 of 2022, is set aside against

the appellant. The criminal appeal is allowed.

11. Accordingly, the above named appellant, in the

event of his arrest/surrender before the learned court below

within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on

anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/-

(Rupees Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

each to the satisfaction of the learned 1 st Additional Sessions

Judge-cum-Special Judge Madhubani, in connection with A.B.P.

No. 704 of 2024, Ladaniya P.S. Case No. 355 of 2022, subject to

the conditions mentioned in Section 438(2) of the Code of

Criminal Procedure.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J)

Shahnawaz/-

U     T
 

[ad_2]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here