By the instant petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India seeking quashing of the orders dated 27.03.2021 and 17.08.2022. In
a disciplinary proceeding initiated against the petitioner, the disciplinary
authority vide order dated 27.03.2021, inflicted a punishment of
withholding of two annual increments with cumulative effect and
thereafter, an appeal was preferred against the said order and the appellate
authority dismissed the same vide order dated 17.08.2022 (Annexure
P/10) affirming the finding given by the disciplinary authority.
2
2. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the
parties and perusal of record and to answer the controversy involved in
this case, it is necessary to consider the facts of the case in short that the
petitioner was initially appointed on 16.08.2000 on the post of Sub
Inspector and thereafter vide order dated 22.07.2010, services of the
petitioner were dispensed with and he was dismissed from service by the
disciplinary authority exercising power under Article 311(2)(b) of the
Constitution of India. Although, the said order was assailed and appeal
was preferred but that appeal was also rejected by the appellate authority
vide orders dated 22.02.2011 and 14.03.2012.
[ad_1]
Source link