Supreme Court – Daily Orders
Amrita Nath vs State Of Haryana on 28 January, 2025
Author: Bela M. Trivedi
Bench: Bela M. Trivedi
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2025
(Arising out of SLP(Criminal) No.12764/2024)
AMRITA NATH APPELLANT(S)
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. RESPONDENT(S)
J U D G M E N T
1. Leave granted.
2. The appeal arises out of the impugned judgment and order dated
05.09.2024, passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at
Chandigarh in CRM-M No. 34136/2024, in connection with the FIR
No.186/2024 dated 22.05.2024, registered under Sections 120-B, 406,
420 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 at Police Station Sushant Lok,
District Gurugram.
3. It is submitted by Mr. Shyam Divan, learned senior counsel,
appearing for the appellant and Mr. Siddharth Aggarwal, learned
senior counsel appearing for the respondent nos.2 to 4, that after
the order dated 05.11.2024, passed by this Court, the parties have
fully settled their disputes and the sale has been duly completed
on 13.01.2025. They have also submitted that full consideration has
been paid and the sale deed has also been registered.
4. According to the learned counsel for the appellant, he would
Signature Not Verified
file an application seeking quashing of the proceedings before the
Digitally signed by
GEETA JOSHI
Date: 2025.01.30
15:54:14 IST
Reason:
High Court, having regard to the said settlement. The learned
counsel for the respondent-State, submits that the custodial
interrogation of the appellant is not required.
5. In view of the above submissions, we are inclined to accept
the appeal.
6. Hence, it is directed that in the event of the arrest of the
appellant – Amrita Nath in connection with the aforestated FIR
No.186/2024, she shall be released on bail, subject to the
conditions that may be imposed by the Trial Court.
7. It goes without saying that the parties may file appropriate
proceedings before the High Court for quashing the criminal
proceedings as may permissible under law, in view of the settlement
arrived at between the parties.
8. Vide order dated 18.09.2024, the appellant was directed to
deposit her passport before this Court. The office is directed to
return the passport of the appellant to her, forthwith.
9. The appeal is allowed.
10. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
…………….………………………………………J.
(BELA M. TRIVEDI)
…………….………………………………………J.
(PRASANNA B. VARALE)
NEW DELHI;
JANUARY 28, 2025
ITEM NO.5 COURT NO.11 SECTION II-B
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 12764/2024
[Arising out of impugned judgment and order dated 05-09-2024 in
CRM-M No. 34136/2024 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana
at Chandigarh]
AMRITA NATH Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s)
IA No. 210935/2024 – EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED
JUDGMENT, IA No. 210934/2024 – EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA
No. 227468/2024 – EXTENSION OF TIME
Date : 28-01-2025 This matter was called on for hearing today.
CORAM : HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE BELA M. TRIVEDI
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASANNA B. VARALE
For Petitioner(s) :Mr. Shyam Divan, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Udayaditya Banerjee, AOR
Mr. Adith Deshmukh, Adv.
For Respondent(s) :Mr. Birendra Kumar Choudhary, A.A.G.
Mr. Samar Vijay Singh, AOR
Ms. Padma Choudhary, Adv.
Mr. Siddharth Aggarwal, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Vishwajeet Bhati, Adv.
Ms. Mrinal Kanwar, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
1. Leave granted.
2. The appeal is allowed, in terms of the signed order, placed on
the file.
3. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
(GEETA JOSHI) (MAMTA RAWAT) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT COURT MASTER (NSH)
[ad_1]
Source link