Rajasthan High Court – Jaipur
Amrita Roy D/O Awadhesh Kumar Roy W/O … vs State Of Rajasthan on 16 January, 2025
Author: Sameer Jain
Bench: Sameer Jain
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 554/2025
Amrita Roy D/o Awadhesh Kumar Roy W/o Shri Kanhaiya Lal
Sharma, Aged About 32 Years, Resident Of Village Kuni, Post
Chausala, Tehsil Nawa, District Didwana-Kuchaman (Raj.) At
Present Resident Of 203, Jagmohan Golden Fortune (Sdc),
Bhawani Singh Road, Bapu Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary,
Medical Education Department, Government Secretariat,
Jaipur.
2. Rajasthan Medical Education Society Jaipur, (Raj Mes),
Through Its Director Having Its Office At Govind Marg,
Janta Colony, Chikitsa Shiksha Bhawan, Jaipur.
3. The Principal, Sms Medical College, Jaipur.
4. The Superintendent, Mahila Chikitsalaya, Sanganeri Gate,
Jaipur.
5. The Government Medical College, Through Its Principal,
Nagaur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tanveer Ahamad
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order
16/01/2025
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the
petitioner was sanctioned maternity leave when she was rendering
services at Mahila Chikitsalya, Sanganeri Gate, Jaipur, which was
valid upto June, 2025. It is further submitted that petitioner
delivered a baby on 05.01.2025.
(Downloaded on 21/01/2025 at 10:00:53 PM)
(2 of 3) [CW-554/2025]
Further, it is submitted that thereafter petitioner was
appointed for the post of Assistant Professor at Nagaur, where
petitioner has applied for extension of maternity leave benefit
before the new employer. However, the said extension was not
granted to the petitioner. Therefore, being aggrieved of the same
the petitioner has filed the present petition.
Additionally, the petitioner has filed a representation before
the competent authority-Director, Rajasthan Medical Education
Society (Annexure-6), however the same is not considered.
Lastly, learned counsel has placed reliance upon the
judgment passed in DBSAW No. 376/2021 titled as State of
Rajasthan and Ors. vs. Smt. Neeraj.
Issue notices.
On directions of the Court, Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC accepts
notice on behalf of respondents.
A copy of the petition is also supplied by the petitioner to the
respondents Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC during the course of
arguments.
Learned counsel for the respondents has assured to
adjudicate the representation filed by the petitioner (Annexure-6),
looking to the facts and circumstances, strictly within a period of
seven days.
Considering the facts and circumstance of the case, and
considering the arguments put-forth by the learned counsel for
the parties, this Court directs the competent authority/Director to
adjudicate the representation filed by the petitioner (Annexure-6),
in accordance with law, strictly within a period of seven days from
(Downloaded on 21/01/2025 at 10:00:53 PM)
(3 of 3) [CW-554/2025]
the passing of this order. Howsoever, liberty is granted to the
petitioner to approach appropriate forum/Court, if still aggrieved.
Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. Pending
applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J
ANIL SHARMA/36
(Downloaded on 21/01/2025 at 10:00:53 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
[ad_1]
Source link