Amulya Sikandar vs Registrar on 26 June, 2025

0
3

26.06.2025

PER DIXIT KRISHNA SHRIPAD, J.

The students are knocking at the doors of Writ Court

complaining that the opposite parties are not permitting

them to take the academic examinations in the Visual Art

course and therefore they having been admitted to the

course duly and they having made all the payments, a

direction should be issued both to the University and to the

College to regularize their course and permit them to take

the imminent examination concerned.

2. Learned panel counsel appearing for the University

opposes the petition contending that the Academic Council

of the University in question vide Resolution No.174 dated

26.03.2015 has upwardly revised the age limit to 35 years

from earlier 23 years for gaining admission to the course in

question; both the petitioners having crossed the age limit

got the admission at the hands of College in question and

therefore their admissions have rightly not been approved

by the University. He also contends that the Academic

Council being the academic body has power to prescribe

conditions of the kind and the judicial institution has to

respect the same since ordinarily it does not have academic

expertise in matters, like this.



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here