Anil Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 17 June, 2025

0
1


Patna High Court – Orders

Anil Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 17 June, 2025

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                        CRIMINAL REVISION No.761 of 2023
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-177 Year-2022 Thana- BEERPUR District- Begusarai
                 ======================================================
           1.     Anil Kumar, Son Of Sri Alakh Narayan Bhagat, R/O Mohalla - Lohiya
                  Nagar Ward No. 28, P.S. - Lohiya Nagar O.P., Distt. - Begusarai
           2.    Amit Kumar @ Amit Kumar Singh, Son Of Sri Ram Pravesh Singh, R/O
                 Vill - Dihpar, P.S. - Birpur, Dist. - Begusarai
           3.    Ram Kailash Pandit @ Ram Kailash Pinhit (Pandit), Son Of Late Ram
                 Nandan Pandit, R/O Vill - Birpur, P.S. - Birpur, Distt. - Begusarai
           4.    Arun Kumar Roy, Son Of Late Gauri Shankar Roy, R/O Vill - Gandhi Nagar,
                 Ward No. 31, P.S. - Nagar, Distt. - Begusarai
           5.    Kshama Kumari, Wife Of Ranjeet Singh, R/O Vill - Naula, P.S. -
                 Bhagwanpur, Distt. - Begusarai
           6.    Lalitesh Kumar Lalit, Son Of Sri Raj Nandan Sharma, R/O Cheria, P.S. -
                 Bhagwanpur, Distt. - Begusarai
           7.    Jyoti Rekha Kumari, Wife Of Amarjeet Kumar, R/O Vill - Dihpar, P.S. -
                 Birpur, Distt. - Begusarai

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s      :       Mr.Ajay Kumar Thakur, Sr. Advocate
                                                   Mrs.Vaishnavi Singh, Advocate
                                                   Mr.Ritwik Thakur, Advocate
                 For the Respondent/s      :       Mrs.Asha Kumari, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIBEK CHAUDHURI
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   17-06-2025

1. The petitioners, in the instant criminal revision,

are all teachers of Middle School, Muzafara Dih, Police Station-

Birpur in the District of Begusarai.

2. On 14th of December, 2022, on the basis of a

statement made by one Fulo Devi of Village – Mallah Dih,

Birpur P.S. Case No. 177 of 2022 was registered under Sections

302 / 34 of the IPC read with Sections 4, 6 and 21 of the
Patna High Court CR. REV. No.761 of 2023(4) dt.17-06-2025
2/5

POCSO Act. It was stated by the de facto complainant that on

12th of December, 2022, her daughter, aged about 13 years,

went to Middle School, Muzafara Dih, at about 09:30 AM for

her studies. After the usual time for the school to close, she did

not return home. She conducted search in the school and one

Amit Singh informed her that her minor daughter had left away

to some unknown destination. Then she conducted frantic search

with her family members and other villagers but did not find her

out during the said night. On 13th of December, 2022, at about

09:30 A.M., when the school reopened, the de facto

complainant, with other villagers, went to the school and

enquired about her daughter from the Principal and other

teachers of the said school who were arraigned as accused in the

above-mentioned case, and, subsequently, they finally found

from a ventilator of a room, which was closed outside under

lock and key that the daughter of the informant was hanging

from a ceiling fan with the help of her dupatta.

3. On the basis of the said complaint, Birpur P. S. Case

No. 177 of 2022 was registered. Police took up the case for

investigation. However, during investigation, it was not even

prima facie proved that the victim was subjected to penetrative

sexual assault or that the teachers of the said school were
Patna High Court CR. REV. No.761 of 2023(4) dt.17-06-2025
3/5

involved in any way in ravaging the said girl. It was further

revealed that the victim committed suicide as a result of some

love affair with a third person, which the parents of the victim

were not ready to accept.

4. After collecting scientific evidence in the form of

FSL Report, Autopsy Report, suicide report, tallying the Suicide

Report with the admitted handwriting of the victim by

handwriting expert and examination of the witnesses, the police

submitted report in final form stating that the allegation made by

the de facto complainant could not be substantiated and it was a

case of sheer suicide as a result of a love affair.

5. After submission of the final report, the de facto

complainant was notified. The case record was produced before

the learned Judge, Special Court under the POCSO Act,

Begusarai and the learned Judge took cognizance of offence

against the petitioners punishable under Sections 302 / 34 of the

IPC read with Sections 4, 6 and 21 of the POCSO Act.

6. The learned Trial Judge came to take cognizance as

aforesaid against the petitioners on perusal of materials in case

diary narrated in Paragraph Nos. 3, 4, 6, 9 and 13. It appeared to

the learned Special Judge that from the statement recorded in

the said paragraphs, it was crystal clear that all the named
Patna High Court CR. REV. No.761 of 2023(4) dt.17-06-2025
4/5

accused persons feigned to have traces of the victim / deceased,

but victim / deceased was found inside a room hanging with

ceiling in the said school. Here the named accused persons tried

to conceal the fact of the death of the victim / deceased and they

also mislead the family members of the victim / deceased

7. Can the above ground be construed as any of the

ingredients of offence under Sections 302 / 34 of the IPC or

Sections 4, 6, 21 of the POCSO Act? The answer would

obviously be in the negative. After closure of a school, if a

student conceals herself in one corner of her classroom or any

portion of the school premises, it is not possible for the teachers

and the guard to say whether the victim was staying inside the

school.

8. The autopsy report clearly states that the victim died

by committing suicide. There is no mark of injury on the body

of the victim. There is also no mark of injury in her private

parts. The FSL report disapproves any sexual assault upon the

victim.

9. Therefore, failure on the part of the petitioners to

state as to whether the victim was available in the school or not,

cannot be said to be a ground to take cognizance of offence

under Sections 302 and 34 of the IPC and Sections 4, 6, 21 of
Patna High Court CR. REV. No.761 of 2023(4) dt.17-06-2025
5/5

the POCSO Act.

10. For the reasons stated above, the impugned order

is bad in law, perverse and liable to be set aside.

11. Accordingly, order dated 3rd of November, 2023,

passed by learned Exclusive Special Judge (POCSO) Act-cum-

6th Additional Sessions Judge, Begusarai in POCSO Case No.

75 of 2023, arising out of Birpur P.S. Case No. 177 of 2022, is

set aside.

12. Final report filed by the police in Birpur P.S. Case

No. 177 of 2022 dated 14th of December, 2022 is accepted. The

accused persons are discharged.

13. The instant Criminal Revision stands allowed with

the aforesaid observation.

(Bibek Chaudhuri, J)
uttam/-

U



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here