Anjanee Kumar Lakhotia vs Shri Maruti Maheshwari And Ors on 3 March, 2025

0
42

Calcutta High Court

Anjanee Kumar Lakhotia vs Shri Maruti Maheshwari And Ors on 3 March, 2025

Author: Soumen Sen

Bench: Soumen Sen

OC-2
                      IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
                         Commercial Appellate Division
                               ORIGINAL SIDE

                                  APOT/57/2025
                                      WITH
                                AP-COM/300/2024
                             IA NO: GA-COM/1/2025

                         ANJANEE KUMAR LAKHOTIA
                                   VS
                     SHRI MARUTI MAHESHWARI AND ORS

  BEFORE:
  The Hon'ble JUSTICE SOUMEN SEN
             AND
  The Hon'ble JUSTICE BISWAROOP CHOWDHURY
  Date : 3rd March, 2025
                                                                               Appearance:
                                                              Mr. Abhrajit Mitra, Sr. Adv.
                                                         Mr. Satadeep Bhattacharya, Adv.
                                                                    Ms. Pritha Basu, Adv.
                                                                 Ms. Sriparna Mitra, Adv.
                                                              Ms. Nairanjana Ghosh, Adv.
                                                         Mr. Debartha Chakraborty, Adv.
                                                                       ...for the appellant.

                                                      Mr. Sabyasachi Chowdhury, Sr. Adv.
                                                                     Mr. Anuj Singh, Adv.
                                                                    Ms. Ankita Baid, Adv.
                                                                    Ms. Trinisha De, Adv.
                                                                   Mr. Rupal Singh, Adv.
                                                                   ...for the respondents.

1. There shall be an order in terms of prayer (a) of Notice of Motion.

2. This appeal is arising out of an order dated 25 th February, 2025 by

which the interim order dated 20th June, 2023 was vacated. Prima

facie, it appears that pursuant to a Memorandum of Understanding

(in short) MOU dated 17th March, 2013 between the respondent nos.1

and 2, the appellant has discharged certain obligations but the fact

remains that the entire consideration amount has not been paid.

There are disputes and differences between the parties with regard to
2

discharge of reciprocal obligation. The aforesaid MOU according to

the respondents have been substituted by the MOU dated 30 th

October, 2013. The learned Single Judge also considered the later

MOU as a substitution of the earlier MOU. However, in relation to the

said MOU although a suit being CS No.54 of 2015 was filed the said

suit was withdrawn after enjoying an interim order for almost eight

years.

3. We have been informed that at the time when the suit was withdrawn,

an application for judgment upon admission was filed in which the

respondents have prayed for a direction upon the present appellant to

perform its obligation under the MOU dated 30 th October, 2013.

4. In view of the fact that there appears to be a part-performance of MOU

dated 17th March, 2013, we consider the prayer for interim order,

subject to the appellant securing a sum of Rs.8 crores by way of bank

guarantee or any other mode of security to the satisfaction of the

learned Registrar, Original Side of this Court within a period of

fortnight from date. There shall be an unconditional stay of operation

of the impugned order for a period of two weeks. In the event the

aforesaid amount is secured, the impugned order shall continue till

the disposal of the appeal.

5. The pendency of this appeal shall not stand in the way of the learned

Single Judge in deciding the application for appointment of Arbitrator.

6. The observation of the learned Single Judge with regard to the earlier

MOU being substituted by the later MOU is an arguable case made
3

out by the appellant and hence not conclusive on the issue. It would

be open for the learned Single Judge to take an independent view on

this issue without being influenced by the observation made by the

learned Single Judge in the impugned order dated 25 th February,

2025. The finding of the learned Single Judge on 25 th February, 2025

with regard to the substitution of the MOU dated 17 th March, 2013 by

30th October, 2013 shall not operate as res judicata in deciding the

matter under Section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.

7. The appeal is admitted.

8. Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, advocate-on-record on behalf of the

respondents, waives service of notice of appeal.

9. The appeal is ready as regards service.

10. The paper books have been filed in Court.

11. The appellant is directed to serve copies of paper books to the

advocate-on-record of the respondents within two weeks from date.

12. Settlement of index and all other formalities are dispensed with.

13. The application being IA No.GA-COM/1/2025 stands disposed of.

14. Since no affidavit is filed, all allegations made are deemed to have

been denied.

15. Let this matter be listed after four weeks.

(SOUMEN SEN, J.)

(BISWAROOP CHOWDHURY, J.)
mg/spal

[ad_1]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here