Patna High Court – Orders
Anku Yadav @ Anku Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 11 August, 2025
Author: Prabhat Kumar Singh
Bench: Prabhat Kumar Singh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46388 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-13 Year-2024 Thana- BARHARA District- Bhojpur
======================================================
Anku Yadav @ Anku Kumar S/o Late Mahendra Yadav @ Munna Yadav R/o
Village- Bhabhangawan, P.S.- Barhara (Krishnagarh), District- Bhojpur at Ara
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shashank Shekhar , Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Renuka Ratnakar (App125)
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
ORAL ORDER
2 11-08-2025
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
A.P.P. for the State .
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection
with Barhara P.S. Case No. 13 of 2024 registered under Sections
147, 148, 149, 452, 323, 354-B, 394, 376, 511, 436, 447, 120-B,
504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code .
3 . As per F.I.R., on 14.05.2023 at about 7:00 a.m., all
the FIR named accused persons including this petitioner entered
the house of informant and started abusing her. On protest, the
accused persons assaulted informant and her family members
with lathi. It is alleged that this petitioner assaulted one Tetri
devi with lathi. It is next alleged that the accused persons
threatened informant and her family members and on gunpoint
snatched gold and other articles, and co-accused Mohan Yadav
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46388 of 2025(2) dt.11-08-2025
2/3
set the house of informant on fire . It is lastly alleged that the
present occurrence took place in the backdrop of Barhara P.S.
Case No. 517 of 2020 which was lodged against the accused
persons for kidnapping and murder of father of informant.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely
been implicated in the present case due to enmity. Though this
petitioner is alleged to have assaulted one Tetri devi but there is
no injury report on record to substantiate the allegation of
assault. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the
petitioner that petitioner is not accused in Barhara P.S. Case No.
517 of 2020, as such he has no concern with the outcome of the
case . As a matter of fact, co-accused Vikash Yadav earlier
lodged a case bearing Barhara P.S. Case No. 291 of 2023 against
brother of informant for the murder of father of co-accused
Anku Yadav and this petitioner had also lodged a case bearing
Barhara P.S. Case No. 220 of 2021 for attempting murder of the
mother of the co-accused Vikash Yadav and the present case is
nothing but an attempt to hold back the petitioner and others
from proceeding in the abovementioned case .
5 . Learned A.P.P. for the State opposed the prayer for
bail of the petitioner.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46388 of 2025(2) dt.11-08-2025
3/3
6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of
the case, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail, in
the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below
within a period of eight weeks from today, on furnishing bail
bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties
of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief
Judicial Magistrate, Ara, Bhojpur in connection with Barhara
P.S. Case No. 13 of 2024 , subject to the conditions as laid down
under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C .
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
Koushik/-
U T
[ad_1]
Source link