Anupama vs A.A.Prakasan on 2 July, 2025

0
23

The construction of a power-of-attorney, based on which sale

deed has been executed, falls for consideration in these appeals.

2. Two suits were tried together. O.S.No.103/2008 was for

mandatory injunction and O.S.No.234/2008 was for partition.

O.S.No.103/2008 was decreed concurrently, while O.S.No.234/2008

was dismissed. Two appeals were filed by the plaintiff in

O.S.No.234/2008 and defendant in O.S.No.103/2008. These appeals

were allowed by judgment dated 07.03.2012 by this Court permitting

the plaintiff in O.S.No.234/2008 to amend the pleadings and adduce

evidence afresh. The said order was challenged by the plaintiff in

O.S.No.103/2008 before the Hon’ble Supreme Court by Civil Appeal

Nos.4241-4242 of 2016. By order dated 19.04.2016, the judgment of

the High Court was set aside and the matter was remanded back to

this Court for fresh consideration and hence, these appeals are listed.

[ad_1]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here