Arjala Dharan vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 11 August, 2025

0
1

Andhra Pradesh High Court – Amravati

Arjala Dharan vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 11 August, 2025

APHC010364882025
                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
                                   AT AMARAVATI                    [3521]
                            (Special Original Jurisdiction)

                   MONDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST
                     TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

                                 PRESENT

          THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO

                      CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 7659/2025

Between:

   ARJALA DHARAN, S/O AMMORU LATE AGED 29 YEARS R/O D.NO.
   36-99-185, RAMJI ESTATE, KANCHARAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM.

                                               ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED

                                   AND

   THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High
   Court of Judicature of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati.

                                         ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:

   KOPPISETTI PARVATI DEVI

Counsel for the Respondent/complainant:

   PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Court made the following:

ORDER:

The Criminal Petition has been filed under Sections 437 and 439 of

the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for brevity ‘the Cr.P.C.’)/ Sections

480 and 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity

‘the BNSS’), seeking to enlarge the petitioner/Accused No.3 on bail in
2
Dr. YLR, J
Crl.P.No.7659 of 2025
Dated: 11.08.2025

Cr.No.202 of 2025 of Kancharapalem Police Station, Visakhapatnam

Commissionerate, registered against the petitioner/Accused No.3 herein for

the offences punishable under Section 20 (b) (ii)(B) read with 8(c) of the

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for brevity ‘the

NDPS Act‘).

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 09.06.2025, on receipt of

credible information regarding the illegal possession and transportation of

ganja, the Sub-Inspector of Police, Kancharapalem Police Station, along

with his staff, secured the presence of mediators, rushed to ITI Junction,

Kancharapalem, to the place between Skoda and Hamza Showroom, and

started conducting vehicle checking. The police noticed one car coming

towards them, intercepted the car, and apprehended its occupants. During

interrogation, Accused Nos. 1 to 3 disclosed their identity particulars, and in

their possession the police seized 3 kgs of ganja under the cover of a

mediators’ report and arrested them.

3. Sri Kopisetti Parvathigi Devi, the learned counsel for the petitioner

contends that the petitioner is innocent of the alleged offence and has been

falsely implicated by the police. It is further submitted that his continued

incarceration would cause undue hardship to his dependents. It is further

submits that for the past 60 days the petitioner has been in the judicial

custody. The petitioner undertakes to strictly adhere to any conditions that
3
Dr. YLR, J
Crl.P.No.7659 of 2025
Dated: 11.08.2025

may be imposed by this Court. In light of the foregoing, learned counsel prays

that the present petition be allowed in the interest of justice.

4. Per contra, Ms.P.Akhila Naidu, the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor

vehemently opposed the grant of bail to the petitioner, submitting that the

investigation is still underway and several material witnesses remain to be

examined. It is contended that if the petitioner is released on bail at this stage,

there is a strong likelihood that he may abscond, thereby hampering the

ongoing investigation and evading the process of law. The learned Assistant

Public Prosecutor further submits that there are altogether five adverse

antecedents against the petitioner, out of which one case is pertaining to

NDPS case in Cr.No.818 of 2020 of Pendurthy Police Station, the other four

offences are IPC offences; and the petitioner was arrested on the spot, and it

is urged to dismiss the petition.

5. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant

Public Prosecutor. Perused the record.

6. As seen from the record, the petitioner is aged about 29 years and has

a fixed abode. He is a resident of Ramji Estate, Kancharapalem,

Visakhapatnam. The petitioner was arrested on 09.06.2025 and has been in

judicial custody for more than 60 days. The petitioner/Accused No.3 was

allegedly indulged in the transportation and possession of 3 kgs of ganja.
4

Dr. YLR, J
Crl.P.No.7659 of 2025
Dated: 11.08.2025

Although it is a non-commercial quantity, the allegation against the petitioner

is that he is a seller of the contraband.

7. Considering the period of detention undergone by the

petitioner/Accused No.3 in judicial custody for the past 60 days, the nature

and gravity of allegation levelled against the petitioner, and his alleged role

played in the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail with

the following stringent conditions:

i. The petitioner/Accused No.3 shall be enlarged on bail

subject to he executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-

(Rupees Ten Thousand only), with two sureties each for the like

sum each to the satisfaction of the learned VII Additional

Metropolitan Magistrate at Visakhapatnam.

ii. The petitioner/Accused No.3 shall appear before the

Station House Officer concerned on every Saturday in between

10:00 am and 05:00 pm, till cognizance is taken by the learned

the Trial Court.

iii. The petitioner/Accused No.3 shall not leave the limits of the

District without prior permission from the Station House Officer

concerned.

iv. The petitioner/Accused No.3 shall not commit or indulge

in commission of any offence in future.

5

Dr. YLR, J
Crl.P.No.7659 of 2025
Dated: 11.08.2025

v. The petitioner/Accused No.3 shall cooperate with the

investigating officer in further investigation of the case and shall

make himself available for interrogation by the investigating

officer as and when required.

vi. The petitioner/Accused No.3 shall not, directly or

indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person

acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her

from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer.

vii. The petitioner/Accused No.3 shall surrender his passport, if

any, to the investigating officer. If he claims that he does not

have a passport, he shall submit an affidavit to that effect to the

Investigating Officer.

8. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed.

_________________________
DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J
Date: 11.08.2025
RSI
6
Dr. YLR, J
Crl.P.No.7659 of 2025
Dated: 11.08.2025

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO

CRIMINAL PETITION No.7659 of 2025

Date: 11.08.2025

RSI



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here