Jharkhand High Court
Arun Ramani vs The State Of Jharkhand …. …. …. … on 21 January, 2025
Author: Anil Kumar Choudhary
Bench: Anil Kumar Choudhary
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No.202 of 2025
------
1. Arun Ramani, Aged about-60 years,
2. Rajesh Ramani, Aged about-44 years,
Both son of-Mritunjay Ramani, Resident of Village-Kalu
Beldanga, Post Office and Police Station-Barharwa, District-
Sahibganj. .... .... .... Petitioners
Versus
The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioners : Mr. Raja Ravi Shekhar Singh, Advocate
For the State : Ms. Vandana Bharti, Addl.P.P.
------
Order No.02 Dated- 21/01/2025
Heard the parties.
Apprehending their arrest in connection with Barharwa P.S. Case
No.137 of 2023 instituted under Sections 147/148/149/109/323/341/325/
302 of the Indian Penal Code, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant
of privileges of anticipatory bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the
allegation against the petitioners is that on being incited by the petitioner, the
co-accused persons assaulted the informant and his son leading to the death
of the son of the informant. It is submitted that the allegation against the
petitioners is false. It is next submitted that the allegation of assault against
the co-accused person Laxman Ramani, who assaulted the son of the
informant with crow bar and upon Dilip Ramani who assaulted on the head
of the informant with axe and there is further allegation against the Ram
Prasad Ramani of repeated assaults but there is no allegation against the
petitioner being present at the place of occurrence. It is next submitted that
the exaggerations have been made against the petitioners and the co-accused
Arun Kumar Rawani and Karan Kumar Rawani who have graver
allegations; have since been given the privileges of anticipatory bail by a co-
ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 28.08.2024 passed in A.B.A.
No.1870 of 2024. It is also submitted that the petitioners undertake that they
will not annoy or disturb the informant or any of his family members in any
manner during the pendency of the case. It is lastly submitted that the
petitioners undertake to co-operate with the investigation of the case and to
furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that
the petitioners be given the privileges of anticipatory bail.
Learned Addl. P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for
anticipatory bail of the petitioners.
Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and
circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of
anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are
directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and
in the event of their arrest or surrendering, they will be enlarged on bail
on depositing Rs.20,000/- each as cash security and on furnishing bail
bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the
like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.-1st Class, Rajmahal in
connection with Barharwa P.S. Case No.137 of 2023 with the condition
that they will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear
before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish
their mobile numbers and photocopy of the Aadhar Cards with an
undertaking that they will not change their mobile numbers during the
pendency of the case and they will not annoy or disturb the informant
or any of his family members in any manner during the pendency of the
case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
Abhiraj/
[ad_1]
Source link