Arun Sahni @ Arun Sahani vs The State Of Bihar on 27 May, 2025

0
2

Patna High Court – Orders

Arun Sahni @ Arun Sahani vs The State Of Bihar on 27 May, 2025

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9930 of 2025
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-99 Year-2018 Thana- UJIYARPUR District- Samastipur
                 ======================================================
                 Arun Sahni @ Arun Sahani S/O Upendra Sahani R/O Village- Chandauli,
                 Ward No. 7, P.S- Ujiyarpur, Distt.- Samastipur.

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Hansraj, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Jai Narain Thakur, A.P.P
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   27-05-2025

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned

A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with

Ujiarpur P.S. Case No. 99 of 2018 lodged on 07.05.2018, for the

offence punishable under Sections 307, 323, 325, 34, 341, 504

& 506 of the Indian Penal Code and later on, section 302 of the

I.P.C. has been added.

3. The allegation in the First Information Report is

that four accused persons including the petitioner were digging

soil to construct the house which was objected to by the

informant and on the order of accused Upendra Sahni to beat

them, co-accused Raja Kumar Sahni, Shyam Kumar Sahni and

Arun Sahni who is the present petitioner, brutally assaulted the

informant’s wife due to which, she sustained injury on her head
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9930 of 2025(3) dt.27-05-2025
2/3

and she became unconscious. Subsequently, she was taken to the

hospital from where, she was referred to a higher centre, but

unfortunately, she died.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

there are general and omnibus allegations against all the accused

persons including the present petitioner and the FIR has been

lodged after a delay of one week from the date of occurrence. As

a matter of fact, the informant’ wife namely, Maheshwari Devi

had died on account of a train accident and she was treated

during the course of treatment at PMCH. The post-mortem

report of the deceased has also been brought on record by way

of Annexure-3 to the present petition which is indicative of the

fact that the death has been caused due to train accident. It has

further been pointed out by the learned counsel for the petitioner

that on exactly similar allegation, co-accused Shyam Kumar

Sahni who has also been named in the FIR along with the

petitioner, has been granted bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of

this Court vide order dated 10.01.2019 passed in Cr. Misc.

No.70710 of 2018 which has been annexed as Annexure-4 to the

present application, wherein, the post-mortem report had been

taken into consideration.

5. Learned counsel for the informant opposes the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9930 of 2025(3) dt.27-05-2025
3/3

prayer for bail of the petitioner on the ground that there is a

delay in approaching the court for bail.

6. In response thereof, it has been submitted that the

petitioner had approached the court for grant of anticipatory

bail, but however, owing to the Covid-2019 breakout, the

petitioner could not surrender earlier and petitioner is now in

custody since 09.01.2025 with no criminal antecedent and

charge-sheet has already been submitted.

7. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for

bail of the petitioner.

8. Taking into consideration the present facts and

circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner, be

enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees

Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

satisfaction of learned District & Additional Sessions Judge,

Dalsingsarai, Samastipur, in connection with Ujiarpur P.S. Case

No. 99 of 2018.

(Soni Shrivastava, J)
Divyansh/-

U      T
 



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here