Ashaq Husssain Bhat And Anr vs Fayaz Ahmad Bhat And Ors on 5 August, 2025

0
2

Through: –

Mr. Showkat Ali Khan, Advocate

CORAM:

HON’BLE MS JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE
(ORDER)
05.08.2025

01. Heard learned counsel for the caveator. Caveat stands discharged.

CM(M) No. 306/2025

01. By this petition, the petitioners have challenged the order dated

24.07.2025, hereinafter for short as “impugned order”, passed by the learned

Principal District Judge, Pulwama for short “the trial Court” in an

application filed in terms of Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation

Act, 1996 in case titled Fayaz Ahmad Bhat Vs. Ashiq Hussain Bhat and

Ors., primarily on the ground that the impugned order is without jurisdiction

having been passed by incompetent Court beyond the purview of

Commercial Courts Act; having been passed in disregard to Section 148-A

of the Code of Civil Procedure, as the petitioners were not put to notice

before passing of the impugned order; the impugned order has been passed

in exparte although the petitioners were on caveat which fact stands

recorded in the application filed under Section 9.



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here