B. Gopalakrishna, vs A.P. Grameena Vikas Bank, on 3 July, 2025

0
38

[ad_1]

It is the case of petitioner that while he was working

in respondent bank, he was convicted and sentenced to two

years rigorous imprisonment in a Criminal Complaint (CC) No.

28 of 1992 under Section 498A IPC. by learned I Additional

Judicial First Class Magistrate, Narsapur. Aggrieved by the

sentence, he is stated to have preferred Criminal Appeal No. 187

of 1995 on the file of learned Sessions Judge, West Godavari

Division at Eluru. Pending Appeal, sentence of imprisonment

was suspended vide Crl.M.P.No. 1757 of 1995 dated

09.11.1995. Consequent to conviction, petitioner was

dismissed from bank’s service on 04.01.1996 as per Regulation

29(3) (a) of Chapter-4 of Manjeera Grameena Bank Staff

Regulations, 1983 read with Section 10(1)(b)(i) of Banking

Regulation Act, 1949. Petitioner challenged the above said order

of dismissal by filing Writ Petition No. 704 of 1996 during

pendency of Criminal Appeal filed by him. The said Writ Petition

was allowed on 23.01.1996 directing the Bank to continue

petitioner in service. Thereafter, respondent Bank filed Writ

Appeal No. 282 of 1996 against the order dated 23.01.1996

which was allowed on 02.04.1996 stating that suspension of

sentence does not amount to suspension of conviction and

upheld his dismissal. Subsequently, Criminal Appeal No. 187 of

1995 was dismissed whereupon, petitioner filed Criminal

Revision Case No. 859 of 1999 in which permission was

accorded for compounding the offence and thereafter Revision

was disposed of acquitting petitioner of the said offence. In view

of this acquittal, petitioner made representation to respondent

Bank for reinstating him into service for which, respondent

Bank rejected his representation as petitioner was not absolved

of the criminal charges but the offence had been compounded

on the basis of compromise entered into between him and his

wife. Aggrieved by the above decision, petitioner filed another

Writ Petition No. 22505 of 2005 in which this Court on

18.10.2005, gave an interim direction for reinstatement.

Petitioner was reinstated into service on 03.11.2005 and Writ

Petition No. 22505 of 2005 was finally disposed on 17.08.2010

as under:

[ad_2]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here