BA1/1079/2025 on 20 June, 2025

0
1


Uttarakhand High Court

BA1/1079/2025 on 20 June, 2025

Author: Rakesh Thapliyal

Bench: Rakesh Thapliyal

                                                                     2025:UHC:5198
              Office Notes,
             reports, orders
             or proceedings
SL.
      Date    or directions                COURT'S OR JUDGE'S ORDERS
No.
             and Registrar's
               order with
               Signatures
                               BA1/1079/2025
                               Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.

1. Mr. Karan Anand, learned counsel for the
applicant.

2. Mr. V.S. Pal and Mr. N.S. Kanyal, learned
Assistant Government Advocates for the State.

3. The present applicant ‘Harsh Tyagi’ S/o
Deepak Tyagi is praying for regular bail in
relation to First Information Report dated
25.03.2025 bearing FIR No. 58 of 2025 P.S.
Premnagar, District Dehradun, which was
lodged against seven persons in which the
applicant has been implicated for the offences
punishable under Sections 109, 191(2), 191(3),
351(3), 324(5), and 352 of BNS, 2023 and Section
3
, 25 and 27 of Arms Act.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits
that the applicant is innocent and has been
falsely implicated, which is evident from the fact
that the complainant himself seen the entire
incident and he has disclosed the name of seven
persons in the FIR, but the name of the applicant
has not been disclosed and during investigation
the complainant discloses the name of the
applicant.

5. He further submits that the present
applicant has no previous criminal history and
is languishing in jail since 27.03.2025 and is a
student of Class 12.

6. Mr. V.S. Pal, learned A.G.A. have not
disputed this fact that the applicant is not
named in the FIR and has no previous criminal
history.

7. After hearing the arguments of learned
counsel for the parties, this court is of the view
that since the applicant is a student of Class 12
and is a young person of 20 years old and has no
previous criminal history and is languishing in
jail since 27.03.2025 and further is not named in
the FIR, therefore, the applicant deserves for
2025:UHC:5198
bail.

8. Accordingly, without expressing any
opinion on the merit of the case the bail
application is allowed.

9. Let the applicant ‘Harsh Tyagi’ be released
on bail on furnishing his personal bond and two
sureties each of the like amount to the
satisfaction of the court concerned.

10. It is made clear that after being released
on bail the applicant is directed to cooperate
with the investigation, failing which the
prosecution is free to move an application for
cancellation of bail.

(Rakesh Thapliyal, J.)
20.06.2025.

SKS
2025:UHC:5198



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here