Babulal S/O Hajarilal vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jp:23477) on 24 June, 2025

0
2


Rajasthan High Court – Jaipur

Babulal S/O Hajarilal vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jp:23477) on 24 June, 2025

Author: Sudesh Bansal

Bench: Sudesh Bansal

[2025:RJ-JP:23477]

        HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                    BENCH AT JAIPUR

     S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7729/2025

Babulal S/o Hajarilal, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Khelaniya, Police
Station Uniyara, District Tonk.
(At Present Confined In District Jail Tonk)
                                                                   ----Petitioner
                                    Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.
                                                                 ----Respondent


For Petitioner(s)         :     Mr. Rajendra Prasad Jogi
For Respondent(s)         :     Mr. Shri Ram Dhakar, P.P.
                                Mr. Onkar Singh Rajpurohit, P.P.



         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL (V.J.)

                                     Order

24/06/2025

1.    Instant bail application has been filed by petitioner under

Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with a criminal case bearing

No.492/2019 for offence under Section 138 of N.I. Act.

2.    Counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner was

granted bail and he had gone out, for earning his livelihood,

therefore he failed to be present in the Court and his bail bonds

were forfeited. Counsel for petitioner undertakes to deposit the

penalty as determined by the trial Court in proceedings under 491

of B.N.S.S. and that the petitioner shall regularly attend the Court

on all dates in future, if he is enlarged on bail, therefore,

petitioner be given benefit of bail.

3.    Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

4.    Heard counsel for petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor

and perused the material available on record.

(Downloaded on 30/06/2025 at 09:42:50 PM)

[2025:RJ-JP:23477] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-7729/2025]

5. Having considered the contention of counsel for petitioner

and specially the undertaking of the petitioner, but without

commenting on merits of the case, this Court deems it just and

proper to release the petitioner on bail, subject to condition.

6. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed and it is ordered

that the accused-petitioner Babulal S/o Hajarilal shall be

released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum

of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the

satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before

the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called

upon to do so.

7. However, before enlarging the petitioner on bail, the trial

Court shall ensure to conclude proceedings of 491 of B.N.S.S. and

to deposit the penalty by the petitioner as determined by the trial

Court. If petitioner again jumps the bail and violate the

undertaking, the same shall be a reason for the trial Court to

cancel the bail, granted by this Court.

(SUDESH BANSAL (V.J.)),J

Gaurav/116

(Downloaded on 30/06/2025 at 09:42:50 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here