Badhan Yadav @ Bihari Yadav @ Badhan @ … vs The State Of Bihar on 7 May, 2025

0
132

[ad_1]

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

A.P.P. for the State.

02. In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in

connection with Roshanganj P.S. Case No. 69 of 2013,

registered for the alleged offences under Sections 147, 148, 149,

353, 120(B), 121, 122, 124(A) of the Indian Penal Code ,

Sections 25 (1-B)A, 26 of the Arms Act, Section 17 of Criminal

Law Amendment Act, Sections 3, 4, 5 of Explosive Substance

Act and Sections 13, 16, 17 and 18 of UAP Act.

03. As per prosecution case, on getting information

about Naxalites hiding at certain places, raid was conducted and

three co-accused persons were apprehended, who disclosed the

name of this petitioner and 13 other co-accused persons and 20-

25 other unknown Maowadies who fled away from the spot. At
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27863 of 2025(2) dt.07-05-2025

the instance of the apprehended co-accused persons, recovery of

huge cache of arms and ammunition, grenade, charger etc. were

made.

[ad_2]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here