Rajasthan High Court – Jaipur
Balchand Saini @ Balu Son Of Shri Chhotu … vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jp:23267) on 16 June, 2025
Author: Ganesh Ram Meena
Bench: Ganesh Ram Meena
[2025:RJ-JP:23267]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 863/2025
Balchand Saini Alias Balu Son Of Shri Chhotu Ram Mali, Aged
About 31 Years, Resident Of Tibbawali Dhani, Village Watika,
Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur (Rajasthan)
----Alleged-Accused-Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Public Prosecutor.
—-Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Saransh Saini
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, P.P.
Ms. Shazadi Bano for
Mr. Ali Mohammed Khan
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA (V. J.)
Order
16/06/2025
1. This anticipatory bail application has been filed by the
accused petitioner under Section 482 B.N.S.S. in connection with
FIR No. 464/2023 registered at Police Station Sanganer Sadar,
District Jaipur City (South) for offence under Section 323, 341,
2. Heard and considered.
3. On perusal of case diary, allegations against the accused-
petitioner is of active participation in the offence and causing
injury to the complainant party. Though as per the submission of
the learned counsel for the petitioner there are general allegations
against all the accused persons, but the anticipatory bail
application of the father of the petitioner Chhotu Ram Mali was not
extended by the Court. Against the order of rejection of his
(Downloaded on 23/06/2025 at 09:39:52 PM)
[2025:RJ-JP:23267] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-863/2025]
anticipatory bail application, Chhotu Ram Mali filed Special Leave
to Appeal Criminal No.17203/2024 before the Hon’ble Apex Court
which was dismissed vide order dated 01.04.2025. The case of the
present accused-petitioner is no manner distinguishable from the
case of the coaccused Chhotu Ram Mali who is father of the
petitioner
4. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances
of the case, this Court is not inclined to extend the benefit of
anticipatory bail to the accused-petitioner.
5. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed.
(GANESH RAM MEENA (V. J.)),J
GAURAV/192
(Downloaded on 23/06/2025 at 09:39:52 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)