[ad_1]
Rajasthan High Court – Jaipur
Banshilal Meghwal S/O Shri Pyarchand vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jp:25450) on 10 July, 2025
Author: Sameer Jain
Bench: Sameer Jain
[2025:RJ-JP:25450]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3685/2025
1. Banshilal Meghwal S/o Shri Pyarchand, Aged About 45
Years, R/o Village Bawdikheda, Police Station Rawatbhata,
Tehsil Rawatbhata, District Chittorgarh, Rajasthan.
2. Virendra Singh Shaktawat S/o Shri Mahendra Singh, Aged
About 50 Years, R/o Subhash Colony, Ramganjmandi,
Police Station Ramganjmandi, Kota Gramin, District Kota
(Raj.), Presently R/o House No. B-22, Moti Nagar
Extension Scheem, Borkhera, Police Station Borkhera,
Kora City, Kota (Raj.)
----Accused-Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
---Respondent
2. Ratanlal Meghwal S/o Kenhyalal, R/o Sandhara,
Bhanpura, Mandsor, Madhya Pradesh.
—-Complainant-Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mukesh Pal Jadoun
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Arvind Sharma
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment
10/07/2025
1. This petition under Section 528 of BNSS is filed, with a
prayer to quash the FIR No.232/2023 registered at Police Station
Ramganjmandi, District Kota Gramin for offences under Sections
420 and 406 of IPC, on the basis of compromise effectuated
between the parties herein, in respect of their inter-se dispute.
2. Learned counsel for both the parties, in presence of their
respective clients, have submitted that the dispute at hand is
inter-se private in nature, which has been resolved by the parties
amicably.
3. Heard and considered.
(Downloaded on 17/07/2025 at 09:49:30 PM)
[2025:RJ-JP:25450] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-3685/2025]
4. At the outset, this Court deems it appropriate to place
reliance upon the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in
Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab [(2012) 10 SCC 303] and
Ramgopal Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh reported in
[2022 (14) SCC 531], relevant portion of which is reproduced
below:
“12. The High Court, therefore, having regard to the
nature of the offence and the fact that parties have
amicably settled their dispute and the victim has willingly
consented to the nullification of criminal proceedings, can
quash such proceedings in exercise of its inherent powers
under Section 482 Cr.P.C., even if the offences are non-
compoundable.”
5. In view of the position of law laid down by the Hon’ble Apex
Court in aforementioned case, and considering the personal nature
of dispute, which has been amicably settled between parties, this
Court deems it just and proper to allow the present misc. petition.
Compromise is taken on record (Annexure-2).
6. Considering the aforementioned, the present criminal
miscellaneous petition is allowed and the FIR No232/2023
registered at Police Station Ramganjmandi, District Kota Gramin
with all consequential proceedings, are hereby quashed and set
aside.
7. Accordingly, the instant petition is allowed. Pending
application(s), if any, stand disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J
GAURAV/73
(Downloaded on 17/07/2025 at 09:49:30 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
[ad_2]
Source link