Andhra Pradesh High Court – Amravati
Bapanapalli Venkateswara Rao Venkat vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 22 May, 2025
Author: K Suresh Reddy
Bench: K Suresh Reddy
lN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATl
THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF MAY,
\.
\.
\ TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
5&`*l\+.*i'=i.=i= T-*
ii=gEi=
-, :PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SURESH REDDY
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5385 OF 2025
Between :
Bapanapalli Venkateswara Rao @ Venkat, S/o. Gangadhara Rao, 47 years,
Behind Nagarjuna Degree College, Patha Sujatha Nagar, Ongole Town (A-7)
Petitioner/Accused 7
AND
The State of Andhra Pradesh, Through I Town P.S. Ongole Rep. by its Public
Prosecutor, High Court, Amaravathi.
...Respondent/Complainant
petition under section 438 of Cr.P.C is filed praying that in the
circumstances stated in memorandum of grounds of Criminal Petition, the High
court may be pleased to enlarge the petitioner/Accused on Anticipatory Bail in 'f,,
the event of arrest in FIR No.381/2023 on the file of Ongo]e I Town Police
?
station, prakasam District registered at the instance Of information given by the
//
¢
/
de-facto complainant;
The petition coming on for hearing, upon Perusing the Petition and
memorandum of grounds of criminal petition and upon hearing the arguments Of 6;
sri Nalluri Ramesh Babu, Advocate for the Petitioner and Public Prosecutor for
the Respondent;
The Court made the following order:
The petitioner, who is Accused No.7 in Crime No.381 of 2023 of Ongole
I Town Police Station, Prakasam District, filed the present application under
Section 482 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking pre-arrest
bail.
2. The said crime was registered for the offences under sections
420, 467, 468, 471 r/w 34 IPC.
•®
.-I
I:I-ITT-vl:I-.--J-:='-+J--I /
gr
3. The case of the prosecution is that the Joint Sub_Registrar,
Ongole, lodged a report alleging that the accused and others created forged
documents and submitted in RegistrarJs office for the purpose of registration
as that of genuine documents and also they forged the signatures of the
revenue officials and health officer for the purpose of creating documents and
also created fake family members certificate and death certificate. Based On
the said report, cases have been registered against the petitioner ancl others.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the
petitioner/A.7 was granted Anticipatory Bail in other 35 cases by this court, by
way oT-a common Order, dated 13.04.2025 in Crl.P.No.3806 of 2025 & batch.
\\ E=
5. ln view of the above facts and circumstances, this court is also
_`--`~
inclined to grant Anticipatory Bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.
i) In the event of arrest of the petitioner/A.7 wlth re#ard tO these
crimes, he shall be released on bail on his executing a personal
bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand only) each
with two sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the
Station House Officer, Ongole I Town Police Station.
ii) After such release, the petitioner is directed to co-operate with the
Investigating Officer.
iii) The petitioner shall appear before the Said Station House Officer
3
KSR, J
Crl-P-No.5385 of2025
the charge-sheet, except on those days, where he has to attend
the Court.
6. Accordingly, the criminal petition is allowed.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand
closed.
~-. ,
EiE
alP J'J
Sd/-K.J. R A BABL!
ASSISTIANl- R STRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION Or-F!CER
Fc_ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ __ _ ~ _ _ _ __ __ \
To, .
/ i/
1. The Station House Officer, Ongole I Town Police Station, Ongole
//,
2. One CC to Sri. Nalluri Ramesh Babu, Advocate [OPUC]
3. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court ofAP [OUT] r
4. One spare copy
MM
HIGH COURT
KSR,J
DATED : 22/05/2025
ORDER
CRLP.No.5385 of 2025
ALLOWED
[ad_1]
Source link