Basudev Tiwary vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 13 June, 2025

0
44

(1) The petitioner is a superannuated employee (tram driver No.

297/641), of the respondent No. 2/ West Bengal Transport Corporation

Limited, who has retired from the service with effect from October 31,

2018, afternoon. The petitioner is aggrieved with the order of the

Managing Director of the respondent Corporation [in short “the MD”],

dated June 26, 2020, that there is no scope for the petitioner to receive

pension option form at this stage and prayer as to the same has been

rejected thereby for two reasons. Being aggrieved, the petitioner has

filed the instant writ petition. The petitioner has sought for the relief

that he be released the pension upon completion of formalities,

including exercise of option, with 12% interest. The petitioner is

agreeable to refund the excess fund drawn as a non-object of pension,

in order to exercise his option for pension.

[ad_1]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here