Introduction
1. This criminal revision petition has been instituted under Section 438 of
BNSS, by the petitioner, Bhai Manjit Singh, challenging the legality and
propriety of the impugned order dated 25.11.2024 passed by the learned
Judicial Magistrate First Class (NI Act)-01, Patiala House Court, New
SAURABH Digitally signed by
SAURABH
PARTAP PARTAP SINGH
LALER
SINGH Date: 2025.08.12
LALER 17:37:38 +0530
Cr Appeal / 122/2025
Bhai Manjeet Singh
Vs.
Radhika Chowdhury
(Deceased through LR Ms. Shreya Kapoor)
Delhi, in Complaint Case No. 1610 of 2023 titled Radhika Chowdhury v.
Bhai Manjit Singh. The impugned order permitted the legal representative
of the deceased complainant to introduce additional documents on record
during the complainant evidence stage. The petitioner asserts that the order
is afflicted with jurisdictional infirmities, procedural irregularities, and
substantive errors, thereby necessitating revisional intervention to prevent
miscarriage of justice. The respondent, represented by the legal heir Ms.
Shreya Kapoor, contests the petition on grounds of non-maintainability,
emphasizing that the order is interlocutory in nature and, in any event,
justified on merits to ensure a fair adjudication. Arguments from both
parties have been heard, the trial court records perused, and relevant
judicial precedents examined. This Court now proceeds to adjudicate the
matter systematically.