Bhoj Manjhi vs Jaglal Manjhi on 20 August, 2025

0
10

[ad_1]

for expunging the name of respondent no.5 and for

substituting her heirs and legal representatives. The appellant

also filed a limitation petition for setting aside the abatement on

the ground that the appellant had no knowledge regarding the

death of respondent no.5 whose marriage was solemnized in a
Patna High Court MA No.972 of 2017 dt.20-08-2025

village Bedupur, P.S.-Taraiya Sujan, District-Gopalganj which is

far away about 150 K.M. from the village of the appellant. It is

further stated that the son of respondent no.5, namely, Sunil

Kumar filed an affidavit regarding the death of his mother

disclosing heirs and legal representatives then he got

information regarding her death. After hearing the parties,

learned appellate court below held that the said petitions have

been filed after too much belated stage of expiry of stipulated

period which is not permissible and the instant appeal is liable

to be abated and accordingly, vide impugned order dated

31.08.2017 held that the appeal is abated.

[ad_2]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here