[ad_1]
Patna High Court – Orders
Bhola Rai @ Bhola Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 30 August, 2025
Author: Chandra Shekhar Jha
Bench: Chandra Shekhar Jha
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27678 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-393 Year-2024 Thana- PIRBAHOR District- Patna ====================================================== Bhola Rai @ Bhola Kumar, S/o Ashok Prasad @ Ashok Prasad Yadav, Resident of village-Sabalpur Chauraha, P.O.- Sonepur, P.S.-Sonepur, Dist -Saran, Pin - 841101. ... ... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Munna Raj, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Md. Ataur Rahman, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 4 30-08-2025
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The accused/petitioner seeks bail in connection
with Pirbahore P.S. Case No.393 of 2024 registered for the
offences punishable under Sections 103(1), 61(2) read with
3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘B.N.S.’).
3. The accused/petitioner is not named in the FIR
and is in custody since 23.10.2024.
4. As per FIR, some unknown persons committed
murder of the husband of informant along with named co-
accused persons against whom suspicion was raised by
informant to commit murder of her husband.
5. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27678 of 2025(4) dt.30-08-2025
2/3
petitioner that the name of petitioner transpired during course
of investigation out of confessional statement of co-accused
Damodar Rai, in furtherance of which, no incriminating
material has been recovered/surfaced during investigation as
to connect petitioner prima facie with present occurrence of
murder. It is also pointed out that different witnesses during
the course of investigation failed to disclose the name of this
petitioner and also, even the confessional statement of
apprehended co-accused person appears contradictory on
point of involvement of petitioner qua actual occurrence.
While concluding argument, it is submitted that investigation
of this case is already completed, for which, charge-sheet has
been submitted and, as such, there is no chance of tampering
with the evidence and moreover the petitioner is a man of
clean antecedent.
6. Learned APP opposed the prayer for grant of bail
to the petitioner.
7. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by
taking note of fact as prima facie save and except suspicion
arising out of confessional statement of co-accused, nothing
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27678 of 2025(4) dt.30-08-2025
3/3
incriminating appears against this petitioner suggesting his
involvement with present crime in question, coupled with the
fact that investigation of this case is already completed,
where petitioner remains in custody since 23.10.2024,
accordingly, the petitioner, above-named, is directed to be
released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-
(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount
each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial
Magistrate, Patna in connection with Pirbahore P.S. Case
No.393 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under
Section 437(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short
‘CrPC‘)/under Section 480(3) of the Bhartiya Nagrik
Suraksha Sanhita (for short ‘BNSS’).
(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.)
Sanjeet/-
U T
[ad_2]
Source link