Bhushan Kumar Singh vs Anamika on 6 August, 2025

0
16

[ad_1]

in which the appellant was ordered to pay an amount

of Rs. 2,50,000/-.

4. Learned counsel for the appellant has

submitted that the impugned judgment is not sustainable in the
Patna High Court MA No.438 of 2022 dt.06-08-2025

eye of law or on facts. Appellate Tribunal has failed to applied

its judicial mind and erroneously passed the judgment. He

further submitted that the Learned Chairman below failed to

recognize that the instant case is barred by doctrine of estoppel

and also failed to recognize that this Court in Cr. Misc No-

57911 of 2018 has already passed orders that no claim and

counter claim can arise in the instant case. The Learned

Chairman failed to recognize the fact that amount claimed by

the respondents were indicated in cash and that has never been

paid by the respondents. He further submitted that the

respondents failed to establish direct proof for payment of

consideration amount.

[ad_2]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here