Bijay Hari @ Bijoy Hari vs The State Of Jharkhand ….. … … on 25 August, 2025

0
2


CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
For the Petitioner :Mr. Saurabh Shekhar, Advocate
Ms. Aayushi Aman, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Govind Ray Karan, A.P.P.

06/ 25.08.2025: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned

counsel for the State and learned counsel for the informant.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with

Giridih (T) P.S. Case No. 144/2024, registered under sections 409, 406, 420,

467, 468, 471, 504, 506, 34 of the I.P.C. pending in the Court of learned

Chief Judicial Magistrate at Giridih.

3. Mr. Saurabh Shekhar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits

that based on an agreement it was agreed between the informant and

Sidharth Traders to supply the coal. He submits that the petitioner has not

received any amount and all the transactions have been made in the account

of Sujit Kumar Gope which has come in the case diary. He submits that Sujit

Kumar Gope has already been apprehended by the police. He further submits

that the matter is arising out of an agreement and completely civil in nature.

He submits that in the complaint itself it has been disclosed that for some

time the business was going on however later on certain benefits have not

been provided to the complainant. He submits that the said complaint has

been converted into F.I.R. pursuant to order of the learned court. On these

grounds, he submits that the petitioner may kindly be provided privilege of

anticipatory bail.



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here