Binay Kumar Mishra, vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 21 July, 2025

0
1


Andhra Pradesh High Court – Amravati

Binay Kumar Mishra, vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 21 July, 2025

APHC010313982025
                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
                                   AT AMARAVATI                [3521]
                            (Special Original Jurisdiction)

                   MONDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JULY
                     TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

                                 PRESENT

          THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO

                      CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6456/2025

Between:

  1. BINAY KUMAR MISHRA,, S/O. BAPAN MISHRA, AGED ABOUT 44
     YEARS, R/O. H.NO.286, ZONE-1/B, BIRSANAGAR, NEARANDRA
     SAMITY, PO TELCO, JAMSHEDPUR,         PURBI SINGHBHUM
     DISTRICT, JHARKHAND STATE, CURRENTLY RESIDING AT FLAT
     NO.402, GREEN CASTLE      APARTMENT, SUJATHA NAGAR,
     PENDURTHI, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.

  2. YOGENDRA CHOUDHARY,, S/O. CHHATTHOO CHOUDHARY, AGED
     ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/O. MALAHTOLA, NARIPANCHEDERA POST,
     KARANDA TANA, GHAZIPUR DISTRICT, UTTAR PRADESH STATE,
     CURRENTLY RESIDING AT FLAT NO.101, NAR RESIDENCY
     SUJATHA    NAGAR,    PENDURTHI,        VISAKHAPATNAM,
     VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT

                                            ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S)

                                   AND

   THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High
   Court of Andhra Pradesh.

                                         ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S):

   GOLLAPALLI MAHESWARA RAO

Counsel for the Respondent/complainant:

   PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
                                     2
                                                                      Dr. YLR, J
                                                          Crl.P.No.6456 of 2025
                                                              Dated 21.07.2025

The Court made the following:

ORDER:

The Criminal Petition has been filed under Sections 437 and 439 of

the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for brevity ‘the Cr.P.C.’)/ Sections

480 and 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity

‘the BNSS’), seeking to enlarge the petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2 on

bail in Cr.No.01 of 2025 of Pendurthy Police Station, Visakhapatnam

Commissionerate, registered against the petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2

herein for the offences punishable under Section 20 (b) (ii)(C) read with

8 (c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for

brevity ‘the NDPS Act‘).

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 01.01.2025, on receipt of

credible information regarding illegal possession of Ganja, the Sub-

Inspector of Police, Pendurthy Police Station, along with his staff and

secured the mediators and rushed to in front of MIG-01, Vuda Colony,

Chinamushidiwada, Pendurthy, Visakhapatnam. The police noticed three

persons with bags suspiciously and on seeing the police, the three persons

tried to escape. The Sub-Inspector of Police along with staff apprehended

Accused Nos.1 to 3 and found in their possession 235 KGs of Ganja. The

Police seized the contraband under the cover of mediator’s report and

remanded to the accused judicial custody.

3

Dr. YLR, J
Crl.P.No.6456 of 2025
Dated 21.07.2025

3. Sri G.Maheswara Rao, the learned counsel for the petitioners,

submits that the petitioners have not committed any offence; they are

falsely implicated in this case; they are sole breadwinners of their family;

they are ready to abide any conditions to be imposed by this Court; and

urged to enlarge the petitioners on bail.

4. Per contra, Ms.P.Akila Naidu, the learned Assistant Public

Prosecutor, opposed in granting of bail stating that some more material

witnesses have to be examined; investigation is not completed; if the

petitioners are enlarged on bail, they would not be available for the

investigation and they would escape from the clutches of law; and it is

urged to dismiss the bail application.

5. Perused the record.

6. As seen from the record, the petitioners were indulged in

transportation and possession of 235 KGs of Ganja. The petitioners have

been languishing in the jail since 01.01.2025 onwards, nearly 190 days

they have been in the judicial custody. This Court, vide order dated

10.07.2025 in Crl.P.No.6658 of 2025, granted bail to Accused No. 3.

7. The learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submits that there are no

adverse antecedents against the petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2, and no

report was filed before the learned Court below by the learned Public
4
Dr. YLR, J
Crl.P.No.6456 of 2025
Dated 21.07.2025

Prosecutor concerned seeking for extension period of judicial custody of

the petitioners up to one year by indicating the progress of investigation

and the specific reasons for the detention of the accused beyond the initial

period.

8. Section 36A(4) of ‘the Act’ states that if the investigation is not

completed within 180 days, the petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2 have an

indefeasible right to bail, unless the Special Court extends the period up to

one year on the report of the Public Prosecutor, indicating the progress of

the investigation and specific reasons for the detention of the accused

beyond the initial period.

9. Keeping into consideration the number of days the petitioners have

been in judicial custody, the nature of the allegations levelled against them,

stage of the investigation and their alleged role in the case, this Court is

inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail with certain stringent conditions.

10. In the result, the Criminal Petition is allowed with the following

conditions:

i. The petitioners/Accused Nos.1and 2 shall be enlarged

on bail subject to them executing a personal bond for a sum of

Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty FiveThousand only), each with

two sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the
5
Dr. YLR, J
Crl.P.No.6456 of 2025
Dated 21.07.2025

learned VII Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate,

Visakhapatnam.

ii. The petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2 shall appear

before the Station House Officer, Pendurthy Police Station,

Visakhapatnam Commissionerate, on every Saturday in

between 10:00 am and 05:00 pm, till the conclusion of the

Trial.

iii. The petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2 shall not leave the

limits of the District without prior permission from the learned

Trial Judge.

iv. The petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2 shall not commit or

indulge in similar offences in future.

v. The petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2 shall cooperate

with the investigating officer in further investigation of the case

and shall be available to the investigating officer as and when

called by him.

_________________________
DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J
Date: 21.07.2025
RSI
6
Dr. YLR, J
Crl.P.No.6456 of 2025
Dated 21.07.2025

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO

CRIMINAL PETITION No.6456 of 2025

Date:21.07.2025

RSI



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here