and the alleged activity of this respondent was not
noticed by the victim’s parental family members and the co-
villagers of the informant. Prosecution witness Kanchan Kumari
(PW-6), the sister of the victim, alleged that the respondent No. 2
firstly phoned and informed her about the missing of the victim
and thereafter, he suggested her (PW-6) to search the victim at or
near Makhdumpur railway station and when PW-6 arrived at
Patna High Court CR. APP (DB) No.541 of 2024 dt.31-07-2025
Makhdumpur railway station, the respondent also came there with
the brother of the victim on a motorcycle and took the said witness
towards the North direction from the station and told this witness
that the dead body of the victim was lying in the bushes and then
PW-6 went to bushes and found the dead body. The said allegation
does not seem reliable, as, one who had murdered a person and
disposed of the body at an isolated place then in normal course he
himself would not reveal the location of the dead body to the
relatives of the deceased and further, as per the evidence of this
witness, the respondent took a tempo and brought the dead body
and PW-6 to the informant’s village. This subsequent conduct of
the respondent also goes against the prosecution’s allegation.