Branch Manager vs Jagdhari Singh on 4 July, 2025

0
23

[ad_1]

For Appellant : Mr. Sumit Shrivastava, Advocate on behalf of
Mr. Anil Gulati, Advocate
For Respondent No.8 : Mrs. Meena Shastri, Advocate

Hon’ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu
Judgment On Board
4/7/2025

1. Questioning the method of calculation of compensation on the

death of a minor child in a road traffic accident on the ground

that that deceased child being only five years old, the award of

compensation of Rs.10,78,000/- is highly exorbitant, appellant

Insurance Company has preferred this appeal under Section

173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short ‘the Act of

1988’).

2. Brief facts of the case are that on 20.2.2014 at about 3:30 p.m.

when daughter of claimants namely Urmila was standing near

the house, pick-up vehicle bearing registration No.MP53-G-

0448 (henceforth ‘the offending vehicle’), driven in a rash and

negligent manner by its driver, dashed her as a result she

sustained grievous injuries and died during the course of

treatment. Due to death of deceased, appellants/claimants,

who are parents of child, filed an application under Section 166

of the Act of 1988 seeking compensation.

[ad_2]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here