Brij Bhusan Pandey vs The State Of Bihar Through The Chief … on 24 July, 2025

0
1

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

counsel for the State.

2. The present application has been filed for the

following reliefs:-

(i) For issuance of order(s) / direction(s)
or writ(s) in the nature of mandamus directing the
Respondent Authorities to institute a case and
lodge an FIR against the Respondent Nos. 6 & 7
and run criminal proceedings against them where
the Petitioner being an RTI Activist made an
application under the Right to Information Act
Patna High Court CR. WJC No.1499 of 2024(2) dt.24-07-2025

before the Respondent Authorities for which he was
directed to pay a cost of Rs.29852/-against the
information he sought for, the Petitioner vide
Nazarat receipt No. 511897 dated 29.09.2023
deposited that amount even within the time limit
but the sought information was not provided to him
by Respondent No. 7 after which he filed an appeal
against the same before Respondent No. 6 where
vide letter No. 2239 dated 13.10.2023 and letter
No. 130 dated 18.10.2023 Respondent No. 6 & 7
respectively fixed the date of hearing as 20.10.2023
but for hiding persistent corruption and
irregularities (which was ought to be revealed by
the response of RTI of the Petitioner) Respondent
Authorities (particularly Respondent No. 6 & 7)
deliberately with bad intentions did not availed the
information to the Petitioner which was sought by
him in his RTI application.



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here