Brij Bihari Gupta vs Manmet on 8 August, 2025

0
40

[ad_1]

The appeals arise from the orders of the High Court of

Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur, wherein the order of the Motor

Accidents Claims Tribunal granting compensation with

respect to the death/injuries suffered in a motor vehicle

C. A. No. 6338-39 of 2024 & Ors.

and the claimants. There were a total of 11 claim petitions

before the Tribunal out of which the insurance company

choose to challenge the award in only three such claim

petitions. The challenge was on the ground of there being

no liability to indemnify, since the injured were gratuitous

passengers in the goods vehicle and the driver was in

possession and ownership of the vehicle on the strength of

an agreement with the registered owner, while the policy

was in the name of the registered owner. Before the

Tribunal, though these contentions were taken,

compensation was awarded and the registered owner, the

driver alleged to be the ostensible owner and the insurance

company were made jointly and severally liable.

[ad_2]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here