Rajasthan High Court – Jaipur
Buddhram Son Of Shri Mamchand vs State Of Rajasthan on 18 August, 2025
Author: Sameer Jain
Bench: Sameer Jain
[2025:RJ-JP:32038]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12252/2025
1. Lalchand S/o Shri Sohan Lal Yadav, Aged About 60 Years,
R/o Ahir Mohalla, Nagarpalika Kishangarhbas, District
Khairthal-Tijara (Rajasthan)
2. Shakti Singh S/o Shri Mansingh, Aged About 39 Years,
R/o Nagarpalika Kishangarhbas, District Khairthal-Tijara
(Rajasthan)
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary And Food
Commissioner, Food Civil Supply And Consumer Affairs
Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. District Collector (Supply), Khairthal-Tijara (Raj.)
3. District Supply Officer, Khairthal-Tijara (Raj.)
----Respondents
Connected With
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12295/2025
Ajay Kumar @ Ajay Singh S/o Shri Amar Singh, Aged About 34
Years, Fair Price Shopkeeper For Gram Panchayat Singorai,
Tehsil Badi, Distt. Dholpur (Raj)
—-Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Food,
Civil Supply And Consumer Matters Department, State
Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. District Collector (Supply), Dholpur.
3. District Supply Officer, Dholpur.
—-Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12446/2025
Omprakash Son Of Shri Bahra Ram, Aged About 63 Years,
Resident Of Gram Panchayat Mancha, Tehsil Kishangarh Bas,
District Khairthal- Tijara (Rajasthan).
—-Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary And
Food Commissioner, Food Civil Supply And Consumer
Matters Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. District Collector (Supply), Khairthal- Tijara (Raj.)
3. District Supply Officer, Khairthal- Tijara (Raj.)
—-Respondents
(Downloaded on 21/08/2025 at 10:00:42 PM)
[2025:RJ-JP:32038] (2 of 3) [CW-12252/2025]
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12445/2025
Himmat Lal Meena Son Of Shri Nanagram, Aged About 50
Years, Resident Of Gram Panchayat Ronijathan, Tehsil
Kathoomar, District Alwar (Rajasthan)
—-Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary And
Food Commissioner, Food Civil Supply And Consumer
Matters Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. District Collector (Supply), Alwar (Raj.)
3. District Supply Officer, Alwar (Raj.)
—-Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12489/2025
Buddhram Son Of Shri Mamchand, Aged About 39 Years,
Resident Of Gram Panchayat Khedki Mukkad, Tehsil Kotputli,
District Kotputli- Behror (Rajasthan).
—-Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary And
Food Commissioner, Food Civil Supply And Consumer
Matters Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. District Collector (Supply), Kotputli- Behror (Raj.).
3. District Supply Officer, Kotputli- Behror (Raj.).
—-Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shashi Bhushan Gupta
Ms. Sudha Gupta
Mr. Keshav Kumar Agrawal
For Respondent(s) : Mr. S. S. Naruka, AAG
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment
18/08/2025
1. Defects as pointed out by the Registry in SBCWP No.
12489/2025, are hereby overruled.
2. The present bunch of petitions pertains to various districts
for allotment and other issues pertaining to fair price shops. The
(Downloaded on 21/08/2025 at 10:00:42 PM)
[2025:RJ-JP:32038] (3 of 3) [CW-12252/2025]
competent authority is stated to be concerned District Collector or
any officer authorised by him.
3. Learned AAG, Mr. S.S. Naruka has taken a preliminary
objection that the matters primarily pertain to policy and there are
different factual disputes which can be addressed before the
competent authority. However, learned AAG is agreeable to the
fact that the contentions or grievances of the petitioners herein
can be heard within a period of 15 days by the competent
authority i.e. District Collector. It is submitted that after giving due
audience and considering the representation of the petitioners,
appropriate speaking order will be passed by the competent
authority.
4. In light of the submissions made by learned AAG, this Court
deems it proper to dispose of these petitions with a direction that
the petitioners or aggrieved parties mark their appearance before
the concerned District Collector on 10.09.2025 at and around
11:00 am and after giving due audience, speaking order will be
passed by the competent authority.
5. This Court makes it clear that till passing of orders, the
allotment of the shops qua the disputed sites will be kept in
abeyance; passing of this order will not cause any prejudice to
either of the sides.
6. These petitions are accordingly, disposed of. Pending
applications, if any, stand disposed.
7. Appropriate remedy will be available to the petitioners, if
they are aggrieved by the order passed by the District Collector.
(SAMEER JAIN),J
Pooja /7,18,195,200,220
(Downloaded on 21/08/2025 at 10:00:42 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)