INTRODUCTION
The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (BSA), enacted as a successor to the Indian Evidence Act of 1872, brings significant reforms to the structure and interpretation of evidence law in India. Among its core components is the concept of the burden of proof, a foundational principle in legal proceedings. It signifies the obligation placed on a party to establish certain facts to succeed in a case. The burden may rest initially on one party but can shift depending on the nature of the facts and the evidence presented during the trial. For legal professionals, judicial officers, and law students, a thorough understanding of how the burden of proof operates within the framework of the BSA is essential. This article aims to examine the concept in depth, highlighting its meaning, statutory basis, practical illustrations, and evolution under the new legislation, thus offering a clear perspective on one of the most vital doctrines in the administration of justice.
MEANING OF BURDEN OF PROOF
The concept of burden of proof signifies the duty imposed on a party to substantiate the facts necessary to establish its claims or defenses in a legal proceeding. It serves a pivotal role in the adjudication of both civil and criminal cases, as it determines which party must prove particular facts for a favorable outcome.
In legal discourse, the burden of proof is broadly categorized into two types:
Legal Burden (also known as the burden of proof in the strict sense):
This represents the obligation to prove a case to the standard required by law. In criminal trials, the prosecution must prove the accused’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. In civil disputes, the claimant is required to establish their case on the preponderance of probabilities, meaning the claim is more likely to be true than not.
Evidential Burden:
This refers to the responsibility to bring forth sufficient evidence to make an issue worth considering by the court. It does not determine the outcome, but it requires a party to present initial evidence to support or refute a claim, thereby enabling the court to evaluate the matter in question.
BURDEN OF PROOF IN CIVIL LAW
In civil cases, the burden of proof lies on the person who files the case, known as the plaintiff. It means that the plaintiff has the responsibility to prove the facts that support their case. The standard used in civil law is called the “preponderance of probabilities. This standard does not require absolute certainty. It simply means that the plaintiff must show that their version of events is more likely to be true than the version presented by the other side (the defendant). In other words, if the judge feels that there is a greater than 50% chance that the plaintiff’s claims are true, then the plaintiff has met the burden of proof.
KEY PROVISIONS RELATED TO BURDEN OF PROOF
Section 104 – Burden of Proof
Section 104 lays down the basic rule regarding who has the responsibility to prove facts in a case. According to this section, the person who wants the court to decide in their favour based on certain facts must prove those facts. If they cannot prove them, their case will not succeed.
For example, if a person claims that someone owes them money, they must provide proper evidence, such as a written agreement, a witness, or a transaction record. If they fail to do so, their claim will be dismissed.
Section 105 – Determining Who Bears the Burden
This section explains how to determine which party needs to prove something in a case. It says that the burden of proof lies on the party who would lose the case if no evidence is presented on either side.
In simpler terms, if you bring a claim and you would automatically lose without showing proof, then you must prove your claim. This principle helps the court decide fairly based on the responsibility of each party.
Section 106 – Facts Known Only to One Person
This provision deals with situations where a fact is specially or exclusively known to one person. In such cases, that person must prove the fact because no one else would reasonably be able to know or provide evidence about it.
For instance, if someone is caught traveling without a ticket and claims that they had purchased one, the burden is on them to show that proof. Since the fact is within their knowledge, they are responsible for presenting it.
Section 107 – Proving Death When the Person Was Known to Be Alive in the Last 30 Years
If someone was known to be alive at any time in the past 30 years, and now another person claims that they have died, then the burden of proving the death lies on the person making that claim.
This rule ensures that people do not falsely claim death for purposes like inheriting property or insurance benefits. The law requires confirmation that the death occurred before accepting it.
Section 108 – Presumption of Death After 7 Years of Disappearance
Section 108 provides a legal presumption in cases where a person has not been heard of for seven years by people who would normally be in contact with them. In such a situation, the law presumes that the person is dead.
However, if someone insists that the person is still alive, they must prove it. This provision is often used in cases involving missing persons, especially in property and family disputes.
Section 109 – Presumption of Marriage from Cohabitation
When a man and woman live together for a long period as husband and wife, the law presumes that they are legally married. If someone disputes this and says they were not legally married, then that person must prove there was no valid marriage.
This section is especially important to protect the rights of women and children born out of such long-term relationships. It stops people from easily denying responsibility or legal obligations.
Section 110 – Possession Means Ownership
This section deals with property. It says that a person who owns property is presumed to be its owner, unless someone else can prove otherwise.
For example, if a person is living in a house and using it peacefully, the law will treat them as the owner. If another person claims ownership, they must show evidence like a sale deed, will, or title document to prove their claim.
CONCLUSION
The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, brings clarity and structure to the rules of burden of proof in the Indian legal system. It ensures that the party making a claim is responsible for proving the facts they rely on, which is essential for fair decision-making. Whether it’s a civil dispute or a criminal case, these rules help courts identify who must provide evidence and when. Overall, understanding the burden of proof helps both parties and legal professionals to prepare stronger cases and ensures that justice is served through a balanced and transparent process.
Also Read:
Rights of undertrial prisoners in India
How To Send A Legal Notice In India