C&Cr vs Gopal Das & Ors on 4 March, 2025

0
52

1. The present writ application has been preferred praying for

direction upon the respondents to cancel and set aside the

orders dated 29.11.2023 and 26.09.2024, passed by the

Controlling Authority and the Appellate Authority respectively

under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.

2. The petitioner‟s case is that the respondent no. 1 was engaged

in petitioner‟s company as a Badli worker on 07.05.1976. The

respondent no. 1 got his provident fund membership only in

the year 1980. The respondent no. 1 attained the age of

superannuation on 01.07.2014 as a Badli. Throughout this

period i.e., 07.05.1976 to 30.06.2014 the respondent no. 1

worked as badli employee i.e., in place and stead of

permanent employees, who were absent for any reason

whatsoever. The certified standing orders of the company

authorises the company to engage „badli‟ workman as

substitute of a permanent workman who used to be on leave

or absent i.e., during temporary vacancy caused by

absenteeism.

[ad_1]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here