Canara Bank Through Its General Manager … vs The Union Of India And Ors on 15 July, 2025

0
1

Patna High Court

Canara Bank Through Its General Manager … vs The Union Of India And Ors on 15 July, 2025

         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                   Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10127 of 2017
     ======================================================
1.    Canara Bank Through Its General Manager, Circle Office, Luv Kush Tower,
      Exhibition Road, Patna - 800001
2.   General Manager, Canara Bank, Circle Office, Luv Kush Tower, Exhibition
     Road, Patna- 800 001.
3.   Branch Manager, Canara Bank, Gopalganj Branch, Gopalganj.

                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                     Versus
1.   The Union Of India, through Special Director, Eastern Region, Directorate
     of Enforcement, CGO Complex, 3rd MSO Building, 6th Floor, DF Block, Salt
     Lake, Kolkata - 700064.
2.   Special Director, Eastern Region, Directorate of Enforcement, CGO
     Complex, 3rd MSO Building, 6th Floor, DF Block, Salt Lake, Kolkata -
     700064.
3.   The State of Bihar through Secretary, Department of Home, Bihar, Patna.
4.   Inspector General of Police, Economic Offences Unit, Bihar, Patna.
5.   The State of West Bengal Through Secretary, Department of Home, West
     Bengal, Kolkata.
6.   Director General of Police, West Bengal, Kolkata.
7.   Deputy General Manager, Department of Banking Supervision, Reserve
     Bank of India, South Gandhi Maidan, Patna.

                                               ... ... Respondent/s
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Petitioner/s   :     Mr.Rajan Ghoshrave, Advocate
     For the Respondent/s   :     Mr.Md.Nadeem Seraj-Gp5
                            :     Ms. Shalini, AC to GP-5
     ======================================================
     CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY
                         ORAL JUDGMENT

      Date : 15-07-2025


                 1. The Writ petition is filed to command the

     respondent authorities to recall the order dated

     04.07.2016

, contained in Letter No. 1220 where

withdrawals from Account No. 2310201010700 held
Patna High Court CWJC No.10127 of 2017 dt.15-07-2025
2/10

in the name of KPC Medical College has been

withheld. Further, to direct the respondent

authorities to accord permission to the petitioner –

Canara Bank to utilize the money, so withheld in the

aforesaid current account, for settlement of the

claims of the persons defrauded by the functionaries

of the said KPC Medical College and Hospital,

Jadavpur. Further, the respondent authorities be

directed to return the money seized from the said

fraudsters, if any, to the petitioner-Canara Bank so

that the same could be adjusted against the

payments already made to the claimants who had

been defrauded.

2. The brief facts culled out of the Writ

petition are that the Petitioner No. 1/Canara Bank,

represented by its General Manager, is a corporate

body constituted under the Banking Companies

(Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings Act, 1970).

A current account bearing No. 2310201010700 in the

name of KPC Medical College and Hospital, Jadavpur

was opened at Gopalganj branch of the petitioner-

Bank. Thereafter, cheques of different banks issued
Patna High Court CWJC No.10127 of 2017 dt.15-07-2025
3/10

in favour of said KPC Medical College and Hospital,

Jadavpur were credited in the said current account

through clearing. The fraudsters have withdrawn an

amount of Rs. 1.65 crore from the said current

account, out of which three cash withdrawals to a

tune of Rs. 60,25,000/- were made and four RTGS

transactions amounting to Rs. 1,05,00,000/- were

done in the account of one M/s Aastha Constructions

maintained with Central Bank of India, Freser Road

Branch, Patna.

3. An F.I.R. was lodged vide, Case No. 83 of

2014 dated 15.07.2014, on the file of Bidhan Nagar

Police Station (West Bengal) for the offences

punishable u/s 419, 420 and 468 of the Indian Penal

Code for the aforesaid fraud. The Bidhan Nagar

Police Station sought details of the accounts and

CCTV Footage during transaction in the said current

account and a notice u/s 91 of Cr.P.C. was issued to

petitioner No. 3(Branch Manager, Canara Bank) on

24.06.2014. The aforesaid fraud has been reported

by the Gopalganj Branch of the Canara Bank to the
Patna High Court CWJC No.10127 of 2017 dt.15-07-2025
4/10

Recovery Legal and Fraud Prevention Wing, Head

Office, Bangalore on 24.07.2014.

4. An F.I.R. bearing No. 34/2014 was lodged

on 12.09.2014 for the offences punishable u/s 406,

420, 409, 467, 468, 471, 472 & 120-B of the Indian

Penal Code with the Economic Offences Wing, Patna

Bihar which is pending for investigation. The

authorities of the Canara Bank also conducted

investigation and on receipt of the investigation

report, one Baleshwar Prasad Sinha, Senior Manager,

who headed the Gopalganj Branch was placed under

suspension on 01.08.2014 and a disciplinary

proceeding was initiated against the said Senior

Manager which resulted in his dismissal from service

from the bank.

5. Several Writ petitions were filed by

claimants before Hon’ble Calcutta High Court

seeking recovery of their respective money. The

Hon’ble Calcutta High Court while disposing of the

said Writ petitions of the claimants directed the

Reserve Bank of India, to depute a responsible officer

to consider the representations of the petitioners,
Patna High Court CWJC No.10127 of 2017 dt.15-07-2025
5/10

after giving an opportunity of hearing to the

petitioners and the representatives of the Bank, and

to take necessary decisions thereof in accordance

with law and the decision so taken shall be

communicated to the Writ petitioners, as well as to

the Bank. In the light of the order of the Hon’ble

Calcutta High court a meeting was convened at the

office of Reserve Bank of India, Patna on 19.10.2015,

wherein the petitioner-Bank has also participated and

an order was passed by the 7 th respondent on

21.10.2015, which reads as follows:-

“In view of the above, I hold a
view that it may not be proper or desirable
on the part of RBI to direct Canara Bank to
settle the claim of the petitioners or
compensate them straightway. The
fixation of liability for negligence/fraud, if
any, has to be on the basis of a decision of
a court of law or any other competent
authority. As stated earlier, the action
relating to the violation of
circulars/instructions of RBI by Canara
Bank is within the province of RBI. What is
appropriate action to be taken against
Canara Bank is a matter to be examined
by the Central Office of RBI.”

Patna High Court CWJC No.10127 of 2017 dt.15-07-2025
6/10

6. Another Writ petition bearing W.P. No.

23255 of 2015 was filed before the Hon’ble Calcutta

High Court by one Md. Syed Rahmatullah & Others

claiming an amount of Rs. 18,00,000/-. In the order

dated 07.12.2015, the Hon’ble Court has observed

as follows:-

“Prima facie, the order of the
Deputy General Manager (Speaking order
of DGM, RBI, Patna) does not inspire
confidence. It is clear that while opening
the concerned account in the Gopalganj
Branch of the Canara Bank, several
infirmities has crept in and having regard
to detection of want of diligence on part of
officials of Canara Bank leading to such
petitioners being defrauded of their heard
earned money, Canara Bank cannot
escape the liability of compensating such
petitioners on the spacious ground as
mentioned in such order.”

7. Pursuant to it, a meeting was held by

Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai on 05.01.2016 in

which the Chairman-cum-Managing Director of
Patna High Court CWJC No.10127 of 2017 dt.15-07-2025
7/10

Canara Bank had also participated and petitioner

Canara Bank has assured to compensate the

affected persons.

8. Pursuant to the order of the Hon’ble

Calcutta High Court and the decision taken in the

meeting dated 05.01.2016, the petitioner-Bank has

settled the claims of 11 claimants amounting to Rs.

1.68 crore out of 13 claims, by debiting its sundry

account. The Deputy Director, Directorate of

Enforcement, Kolkata on 04.07.2016 issued a letter

bearing No. 1220 and directed the petitioner-Canara

Bank not the permit withdrawal from the said current

account of KPC Medical College and Hospital until

further orders. Being aggrieved by the same, the

present Writ petition is filed.

9. Heard the Learned counsel for the

petitioner as well as the Learned counsel for the

respondents.

10. It is the specific contention of the

Learned counsel for the petitioner that the Bank has

granted loans to KPC Medical College and Hospital
Patna High Court CWJC No.10127 of 2017 dt.15-07-2025
8/10

and recovery has to be made. Withdrawal have been

withheld from the account of KPC Medical College

and Hospital and the petitioner-Bank would suffer

loss if the impugned order remain in effect and

hence, prayed to set aside the impugned order.

11. On perusal of the entire Writ petition, it

is evident that the account holder i.e., KPC Medical

College and Hospital was not made as party to the

Writ petition. The content of the Writ petition also

disclose that one of the Senior Manager of Canara

Bank was in hand and gloves with the fraudsters and

his services were terminated by the bank. It is

evident from the records and the pleadings that

fraud has been committed by KPC Medical College

and Hospital which is under investigation by the

Enforcement Directorate and is also the subject

matter of criminal cases instituted against the

fraudsters.

Patna High Court CWJC No.10127 of 2017 dt.15-07-2025
9/10

12. The bank has no right to settle the

disputes involving the fraudsters. Once the criminal

proceedings are pending before the criminal court.

Though, it is contended by the Learned counsel for

the petitioner that there are specific directions from

the Reserve Bank of India to settle the matters

involving such fraud, the bank is not an adjudicating

authority to settle these matters. Further, the orders

directing the Canara bank to settle the disputes was

not placed before this Court. Further, it is also noted

that the Canara Bank was not a party to the Writ

petitions in which directions were issued by the

Hon’ble Calcutta High Court.

13. Therefore, this Court is of the considered

view that the Bank has no locus standi to file the

present Writ petition for challenging the order of

Directorate Enforcement for withdrawals of the

amounts of KPC Medical College and Hospital. It is
Patna High Court CWJC No.10127 of 2017 dt.15-07-2025
10/10

pertinent to mention that KPC Medical College and

Hospital was not arrayed as party to the Writ

petition. The aggrieved party would be the KPC

Medical College and Hospital to challenge the orders

of Directorate Enforcement as their account

withdrawals were withheld.

14. In view of the above discussion, the Writ

petition is dismissed as it is devoid of merits.

(G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J)
amitkr/-

AFR/NAFR                 NAFR
CAV DATE                 N/A
Uploading Date           29.07.2025
Transmission Date        N/A
 



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here