Cbi/Acb/Blr vs Lalith Bazad on 25 July, 2025

0
1

The Inspector of Police, Central Bureau of

Investigation [‘CBI’ in short], Anti Corruption Bureau

Bengaluru, has submitted charge sheet against the

accused alleging the commission of offences punishable

U/Sec.384 of Indian Penal Code [‘IPC’ in short] and

U/Sec.7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act-1988 [‘PC

Act’ in short].

3 Spl.CC.9/2022

2. The facts of the prosecution case, as per

Charge-Sheet, are that;

On 28.01.2021 and 29.01.2021, when CW.1 Sri.

Mikhil Innani, CW.2 Smt. Diksha and CW.3 Sri. Harish

Innani visited Office of Enforcement Directorate [‘ED’ in

short], Bengaluru, in connection with enquiry in ECIR

No.3/2021 registered by ED, Bengaluru; at that time,

accused, being the public servant as Enforcement Officer,

working at Directorate of Enforcement, Bengaluru,

demanded undue advantage of Rs.50 lakhs in cash from

CW.1 to close the matter of M/s. Apollo Finvest and

received undue advantage of Rs.5 lakhs from CW.1 which

was sent through CW.7-Manavendra Bhati on

09.02.2021 at Levels Pub and Kitchens situated at

J.P.Nagar, Bengaluru at night hours as a reward for the

improper and dishonest performance of a public duty

and accused being the public servant as Enforcement

Officer at ED Bengaluru, has intentionally and

dishonestly threatened CW.1-Mikhil Innani to register a

case against M/s. Apollo Finvest and also threatened to

drag on the said matter for at least 10 years and to ruin
4 Spl.CC.9/2022

the name and business of M/s. Apollo Finvest and its

management, if CW.1 fails to pay Rs.50 lakhs in cash and

subsequently accused was succeeded in extorting Rs.5

lakhs from CW.1 and thereby the accused has committed

the offences punishable U/Sec.384 of Indian Penal Code

and U/Sec.7 of Prevention of Corruption Act.



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here