Jharkhand High Court
Chandan Ramani @ Chandan Kumar Ramani vs The State Of Jharkhand on 21 January, 2025
Author: Anil Kumar Choudhary
Bench: Anil Kumar Choudhary
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No.2650 of 2024
------
Chandan Ramani @ Chandan Kumar Ramani, Aged about 36 years,
Son of Pradeep Ramani, Resident of- Sardha Nagar, Sakrogarh, Near
Old S.P. Kothi, Post Office- Sahibganj, Police Station: Jirwabari,
District- Sahibganj. …. …. …. Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Ashish Kumar, S/o Deodat, aged about 45 years, R/O Vill- Bari
Kodarjanna, Sahibganj, P.O.- Sahibganj, P.S. Sahibganj (M), Dist.-
Sahibganj, present address- R/O- Updakghar, P.O.- Barharwa, P.S.-
Barharwa, Dist.- Sahibganj (Jharkhand)
…. …. …. Opposite Parties
——
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
——
For the Petitioner : Mr. Swami Nath Pd. Rai, Advocate
Mr. Ranjan Kr. Singh, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Arun Kr. Dey, Addl. P.P
------
Order No.09 Dated- 21-01-2025
Heard the parties.
Apprehending his arrest in connection with Barharwa P.S. Case
No.136 of 2023 instituted under Sections 323, 353, 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 504,
506, 120B, 34 of the Indian Penal Code, the petitioner has moved this Court
for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the
allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner along with the co-
accused Shrishti Kumari against whom allegation is that she withdrew
money from the account of the victim by putting forged signature and kept
the same in the account of the accused No.2 namely Ratan Karamkar; and
unknown persons came to the office of the informant and used criminal force
and deterred him from discharging his duties. It is submitted that the
allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted that the main
allegation is against the accused Nos.1 and 2 namely Shrishti Kumari and
Ratan Karamkar and there is no allegation against the petitioner of cheating
and forgery. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-13 of the instant
bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner
has no criminal antecedent. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner
undertakes to co-operate with the investigation of the case and to furnish
sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the
petitioner be given the privileges of anticipatory bail.
Learned Addl. P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for
anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and
circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory
bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to surrender in
the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or
surrendering, he will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.20,000/- as cash
security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand)
with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.-
1st Class, Rajmahal in connection with Barharwa P.S. Case No.136 of 2023
with the condition that he will co-operate with the investigation of the
case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by
him and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card
with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the
pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section
438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
Animesh/
[ad_1]
Source link