Chandra Bhushan Praveen, The Then … vs The State Of Bihar Through The Principal … on 21 July, 2025

0
33

[ad_1]

Date : 21-07-2025

Heard Mr. Ranjeet Kumar, learned Advocate for the

petitioner and Mr. Sajid Salim Khan, learned SC-5 for the State.

2. The challenge in the present writ petition is made

to the order no. 92/2018-19, as contained in Memo No. 01-

1490/Estab., Buxar dated 10.09.2018, issued by the District

Magistrate, Buxar, whereby the petitioner has been dismissed

from service and further restrained from any future appointment

under the Government. Besides, he is held not entitled for any

benefits, except subsistence allowance for the period of
Patna High Court CWJC No.2410 of 2021 dt.21-07-2025

suspension. The petitioner is further aggrieved with the order

dated 07.02.2020, in Service Appeal No. 190/2018, issued by

the Divisional Commissioner, Patna Division, Patna whereby

the appeal preferred by the petitioner came to be rejected and

the order of disciplinary authority, aforenoted, is duly affirmed.

The enquiry report is also under challenge, on the ground of

being based on no evidence.

[ad_2]

Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here