[ad_1]
This is an appeal preferred by the appellant
under Section 374(3) r/w Sec.389 of Cr.PC seeking to
set aside the impugned judgment and sentence
passed by the Court of the learned XX ACMM,
Bengaluru, in C.C.No.20623/17 on 06.05.2019 for
the offence punishable under Sec.138 of the
Negotiable Instruments Act and for permission to
adduce evidence in support of his case.
2. The parties shall be referred to by the
ranks held by them before the learned trial Court for
the sake of convenience, clarity and to avoid
confusion.
3. The legacy of the present case in a nut
shell could be summarised as follows;
3a) The accused is the proprietor of S.G Rent A
Car, is carrying on the business and is responsible
for the day today affairs of the establishment. The
complainant claims to have had acquaintances with
the accused for the past three years. The accused is
alleged to have approached the complainant during
June, 2016 seeking hand loan of Rs.25,00,000/- for
his business. The complainant claims to have lent
the loan by way of cheque bearing No.870068 dated
16.06.2016 drawn on the Union Bank of India
Bengaluru. The accused is said to have executed on
demand promissory note and consideration receipt on
16.06.2016. The wife of the accused
Smt.Pavithra.K.S. had affixed her signature on the on
demand promissory note as guarantor to the loan
transaction.
[ad_2]
Source link