Chetan Sharma S/O Shri Pappulal Sharma vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jp:23101) on 11 June, 2025

0
1


Rajasthan High Court – Jaipur

Chetan Sharma S/O Shri Pappulal Sharma vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jp:23101) on 11 June, 2025

[2025:RJ-JP:23101]

        HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                    BENCH AT JAIPUR

     S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6321/2025

Chetan Sharma S/o Shri Pappulal Sharma, Aged About 28 Years,
R/o Ward No. 5 Brahmino Ka Mohalla, Simarla Jageer Police
Station Shrimadhopur, District Sikar (Raj.) (At Present Accused
Petitioner Confined In Sab Jail Neemkathana District Sikar).
                                                                   ----Petitioner
                                    Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
                                                                 ----Respondent

Connected With
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6425/2025

1. Sanjay Rao @ Sanju S/o Makhanlal Rao, Aged About 24
Years, R/o Ward No. 04, Simarla Jagir Police Station
Srimadhopur, District Sikar, Rajasthan. (Presently Accused
Is Confined In Jail Neemkathana).

2. Vijay Kumar Rao S/o Makhanlal Rao, Aged About 32 Years,
R/o Ward No. 04, Simarla Jagir Police Station Srimadhopur,
District Sikar, Rajasthan. (Presently Accused Is Confined In
Jail Neemkathana).

3. Arjunlal S/o Madanlal, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Ward No.
04, Soni Colony, Police Station Kotwali Sikar Rajasthan.
(Presently Accused Is Confined In Jail Neemkathana).

4. Sonu S/o Bhomaram, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Ward No.
20 Reengus, Police Station Reengus, District Sikar,
Rajasthan.(Presently Accused Is Confined In Jail
Neemkathana).

—-Petitioners
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

—-Respondent
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6516/2025
Nanuram S/o Shri Bhaguram, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Dhani
Kurbali Parthvipura, Police Station Srimadhopur, District Sikar
(Raj.) (At Present Confined In Jail Neem Ka Thana).

—-Petitioner

(Downloaded on 17/06/2025 at 09:41:13 PM)
[2025:RJ-JP:23101] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-6321/2025]

Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

—-Respondent
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6875/2025
Surendra Kumar Sharma S/o Shankarlal Sharma, R/o Ramjipura
Chainpura Khachariyawas, Tehsil Dantaramgarh District Sikar.
(At Present Confined In District Jail Sikar).

                                                                       ----Petitioner
                                     Versus
The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
                                                                     ----Respondent


For Petitioner(s)          :     Mr. K.K. Bhinda
                                 Mr. Sultan Singh Kuri
                                 Mr. Atar Singh
For Respondent(s)          :     Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP
                                 Mr. Abhimanyu Singh Yaduvanshi for
                                 complainant



HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA (V. J.)

Order

11/06/2025

1. These bail applications have been filed by the accused-

petitioners under Section 483 of BNSS in respect of FIR No.

78/2024 registered at Police Station Reengus, District Sikar for the

offences punishable under Sections 420, 409 & 120B of IPC.

2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the

accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in the instant

FIR, whereas no offence whatsoever has been committed by

them. Learned counsel further submits that the accused-

petitioners are employees in four different firms established by the

complainant and are low paid employees. Even as per FIR, main

allegation is against accountants Dheeraj Sakhunia and Pankaj.

(Downloaded on 17/06/2025 at 09:41:13 PM)
[2025:RJ-JP:23101] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-6321/2025]

There is no specific allegation of committing any overt act against

the accused-petitioners. Charge-sheet has already been prepared.

Even otherwise, the alleged offences are triable by the Magistrate

and the accused-petitioners are behind the bars since long time.

Trial is likely to take considerably long time. Therefore, the

accused-petitioners may be allowed to enlarge on bail.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed these

bail applications.

4. Considered the submissions made at Bar.

5. Taking into consideration, the overall facts and circumstances

of the case, this Court without expressing any opinion on the

merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge

the accused-petitioners on bail.

6. Accordingly, these Bail Applications are hereby allowed. The

accused-petitioners Chetan Sharma S/o Shri Pappulal

Sharma, Sanjay Rao @ Sanju S/o Makhanlal Rao, Vijay

Kumar Rao S/o Makhanlal Rao, Arjunlal S/o Madanlal, Sonu

S/o Bhomaram, Nanuram S/o Shri Bhaguram & Surendra

Kumar Sharma S/o Shankarlal Sharma shall be released on

bail in pursuance of FIR No. 78/2024 registered at Police Station

Reengus, District Sikar on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.

1,00,000/- each along with two sureties of the like amount. That

apart, the accused-petitioners shall also follow the conditions as

under:-

(i) They shall not tamper with any evidence, nor would influence

the witnesses in the case.

(Downloaded on 17/06/2025 at 09:41:13 PM)

[2025:RJ-JP:23101] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-6321/2025]

(ii) They shall not leave the country without prior permission of

the Court.

(iii) They shall co-operate in the trial and shall attend each and

every date of hearing in the trial, until and unless their presence is

exempted by the trial Court.

7. In case of failure of observance of the conditions, a ground

for cancellation of bail would arise.

8. Office is directed to place a copy of this order in each

connected case file.

(ANAND SHARMA (V. J.)),J

DIVYA /355-358

(Downloaded on 17/06/2025 at 09:41:13 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here