Chinta Srinivas Alias Chinthha … vs The State Of Telangana, on 12 August, 2025

0
4


Telangana High Court

Chinta Srinivas Alias Chinthha … vs The State Of Telangana, on 12 August, 2025

       HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA
            CRIMINAL PETITION No.10254 of 2025
ORDER:

This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 528 Bharatiya

Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) by the

petitioner/accused seeking to quash the proceedings against him

in Crime No.158 of 2025 on the file of Mudhole Police Station,

Nirmal, registered for the alleged offences punishable under

Sections 316(2), 316(5) and 318(4) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita,

2023 (for short ‘BNS’).

2. Heard Sri Bhargava Krishna L, learned counsel for the

petitioner and Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional

Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent No.1-State.

3. Though this petition is filed for quashing the proceedings in

the crime, during the course of arguments, learned counsel for

petitioner has sought for directions to the Police to proceed with

investigation by issuing notice under Section 35(3) of Bharatiya

Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) (Previously Section 41-A of

Cr.P.C.).

2

ETD, J
Crl.P_10254_2025

4. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor has not disputed the

same.

5. Considering the submissions of both the counsel and on

perusal of the material available on record, it is seen that the

allegations are under Sections 316(2), 316(5) and 318(4) of BNS

and the punishment prescribed for the said offences alleged

against the petitioner is less than seven (07) years. Hence,

without going into the merits of the case, this Court deems it

appropriate to direct the petitioner to appear before the

Investigating Officer on or before 29.08.2025 between 11:00 a.m.

and 05:00 p.m. and in turn, the Investigating Officer is directed to

follow the procedure laid down under Section 35 (3) of the BNSS

(previously section 41-A of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973) and

also the guidelines formulated by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of

India in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar 1 scrupulously.

However, the petitioner shall submit his defense and co-operate

with the Investigating Officer as and when required by furnishing

information and produce all relevant documents/material required

for the purpose of the investigation and the Investigating Officer

1
(2014) 8 SCC 273
3
ETD, J
Crl.P_10254_2025

shall consider the same and shall complete the investigation

strictly in accordance with law.

6. With the above said observations, this Criminal Petition is

disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

7. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any,

shall stand closed.

__________________________________
JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA
12.08.2025
GV



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here